2009
DOI: 10.1387/ijdb.072493rb
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waves and patterning in developmental biology: vertebrate segmentation and feather bud formation as case studies

Abstract: In this article we will discuss the integration of developmental patterning mechanisms with waves of competency that control the ability of a homogeneous field of cells to react to pattern forming cues and generate spatially heterogeneous patterns. We base our discussion around two well known patterning events that take place in the early embryo: somitogenesis and feather bud formation. We outline mathematical models to describe each patterning mechanism, present the results of numerical simulations and discus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
(147 reference statements)
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is mounting evidence for the validity of Turing-based models to explain pattern evolution in several diverse biological systems, including feather bud arrangements (Baker et al, 2009), hair follicle spacing (Maini et al, 2006;Sick et al, 2006), palatal rugae distribution (Economou et al, 2012), tongue papilla patterning (Zhou et al, 2006), digit patterning (Raspopovic et al, 2014) and zebrafish mesodermal pigmentation (Eom et al, 2012;Kondo and Miura, 2010), and it is interesting that Bmp ligands Development (2016Development ( ) 143, 427-436 doi:10.1242 appear to act as Turing inhibitors in several of these systems (Garfinkel et al, 2004;Harris et al, 2005;Mou et al, 2011). In the intestine, we have seen that several different Bmp ligands are expressed by clusters (Bmp2, 4, 5, 7) and functional assays indicate that high concentrations of all of these Bmps act to inhibit the formation of clusters (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is mounting evidence for the validity of Turing-based models to explain pattern evolution in several diverse biological systems, including feather bud arrangements (Baker et al, 2009), hair follicle spacing (Maini et al, 2006;Sick et al, 2006), palatal rugae distribution (Economou et al, 2012), tongue papilla patterning (Zhou et al, 2006), digit patterning (Raspopovic et al, 2014) and zebrafish mesodermal pigmentation (Eom et al, 2012;Kondo and Miura, 2010), and it is interesting that Bmp ligands Development (2016Development ( ) 143, 427-436 doi:10.1242 appear to act as Turing inhibitors in several of these systems (Garfinkel et al, 2004;Harris et al, 2005;Mou et al, 2011). In the intestine, we have seen that several different Bmp ligands are expressed by clusters (Bmp2, 4, 5, 7) and functional assays indicate that high concentrations of all of these Bmps act to inhibit the formation of clusters (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During cluster patterning, evidence suggests that Bmp ligands act as the Turing inhibitor while modifiers of Bmp signaling, such as twisted gastrulation (Twsg1), may comprise the Turing activator (Walton et al, 2016). Thus, intestinal mesenchymal cluster patterning can be added to a growing list of biological systems that behave in accord with the Turing model, including: patterning of digits (Raspopovic et al, 2014), chick feather buds (Baker et al, 2009), hair follicles (Maini et al, 2006;Sick et al, 2006), zebrafish mesodermal pigment (Eom et al, 2012) and tongue papillae (Zhou et al, 2006). In summary, murine villus development occurs through rapid conversion of a thick pseudostratified epithelial tube into a regular field of patterned villus domes, a process initiated by epithelially secreted Hh ligands.…”
Section: Villus Formation and Patterning In The Mousementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mathematical formulation is preferable due to the clear advantage of yielding analytical analyses. Moreover, biological interactions and processes are often nonlinear, and this is where intuitive, verbal reasoning may let us down; whereas mathematical methods allow us to analyse diverse biological processes (Baker et al 2009). …”
Section: Animal Growth Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%