1966
DOI: 10.1007/bf00988732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ways for speeding up pneumatic testing of dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the early developments of pneumatic gauging systems, analogue pressure transducers were utilized such as Wheatstone bridges attached to a bellows and fixed resistor to obtain digital signals [20,21]. Techniques for speeding up pneumatic testing of dimensions spans back as far as 1966 in the work of Kurochkin and Tsidulko [22] when they proposed the idea that pneumatic gauging techniques could be applied for in-process measurement. Developments in pressure transducer technology have lead to surface characteristics being detected by pneumatic dimension measurement systems.…”
Section: Pneumatic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the early developments of pneumatic gauging systems, analogue pressure transducers were utilized such as Wheatstone bridges attached to a bellows and fixed resistor to obtain digital signals [20,21]. Techniques for speeding up pneumatic testing of dimensions spans back as far as 1966 in the work of Kurochkin and Tsidulko [22] when they proposed the idea that pneumatic gauging techniques could be applied for in-process measurement. Developments in pressure transducer technology have lead to surface characteristics being detected by pneumatic dimension measurement systems.…”
Section: Pneumatic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During static tests, Wager investigated a rectangular nozzle head (0.2 mm x 2.5 mm) that utilized an anvil to maintain a stand-off distance of 20 llm and found a linear relationship between the roughness of the surf:lce and the gauge readings for roughnesses ranging from 3.8 llm to 22.9 llm Ra. Wagner daimed that the dynamic tests were able to confirm that the motion of a smooth work swface past the gauge nozzle had very little effect on the pneumatic gauging circuit.…”
Section: Pneumatic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%