Ways of ‘appealing to the institution’ in interprofessional rehabilitation team decision-making

Dall, Tanja; Sarangi, Srikant

doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.012

Cited by 12 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Researchers in settings such as health care and social work have defined decision-making as an incremental process that takes place through discourse and results in commitment to future action (Dall & Sarangi, 2018). Exploring Home Visit Decision-Making / Hancock decision-making as a process rather than simply an outcome (i.e., specific decision made) reveals new opportunities for EIs to engage families in making decisions about their child.…”

Section: Defining Decision-makingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Moving Toward More Meaningful Family Participation During Home Visit Decision-Making

Hancock

2021

Young Exceptional Children

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Defining Decision-makingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Moving Toward More Meaningful Family Participation During Home Visit Decision-Making

Hancock

2021

Young Exceptional Children

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Researching the communicative practices between front-line professionals and the unemployed That the lack of the conclusive effects of WtW policies is not (merely) a matter of failed implementation or of a management regime gone wrong is exemplified by the growing literature, which examines what happens in concrete meetings between professionals and unemployed individuals; that is, how policies are brought about in personal interactions (e.g. Eskelinen and Olesen, 2010;Caswell et al, 2011;Dall and Sarangi, 2018;Dall, 2018, Matarese andCaswell, 2018). Using discourse and conversation analysis, this literature shows an interest in the variations and nuances of individual cases, and offers important insights into the 'working' of policies at the micro level.…”

Section: Researching the Front-line Of Wtw Bureaucraciesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reconsidering ‘What Works’ in Welfare-to-Work with the Vulnerable Unemployed: The Potential of Relational Causality as an Alternative Approach

Dall¹,

Danneris²

2019

Social Policy and Society

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is growing interest in research that informs more effective practices in employment services across Europe, Australia and the USA. However, despite the ever-expanding amount of research on the implementation and efficacy of various policy programmes in practice, the knowledge on how to bring unemployed individuals closer to the labour market remains ambiguous and inconclusive. This is especially so in the context of the more vulnerable unemployed, who face physical, mental and social challenges in addition to unemployment. In this article, we examine the existing literature in terms of its potential to inform (the development of) effective employment policies. On this basis, we outline an alternative approach based on the concept of relational causality, and discuss the implications of such an approach for applied policy research.

show abstract

“…When the institutional framework is invoked by professionals (Nielsen et al 2012), a global dimension for discursive organization applies beyond the immediate turns and sequences. With meaning constructed (Heritage 2005) based upon mutual expectations, procedural limits, and situated expertise (Dall and Sarangi 2018), the evidence of interactive framing shows (O'Malley 2009).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Framing in interactive academic talk

Pan

2021

PRAG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Framing involves how language users conceptualize what is happening in interaction for situated interpretation of roles, purposes, expectations, and sequences of action, thus show significant conceptual relevance to the analysis of routinized institutional communication. Having established a working definition of framing based on an intensive review of previous research, this study investigates university students’ and tutors’ framing behaviors in interactive small group talk. Two types of framing-in-interaction, -alternate framing of a single situation and co-framing within/beyond speaker role boundary-, are identified, examined, and characterized from a conversation-analytic perspective. The findings suggest that alternate framings co-occur with traceable interactional devices for sequential organization when the single situation at talk takes on divergent meaning potentials to be accessed. Co-framings happen when at least one (group) of participants is highly goal-oriented, showing conditional relevance to the prior courses of action and more explicit negotiation of epistemic stances. Framing, therefore, can be arguably taken as a global organization resource to characterize contextualization in institutional communication.

show abstract

Ways of ‘appealing to the institution’ in interprofessional rehabilitation team decision-making

Cited by 12 publications

References 21 publications

Moving Toward More Meaningful Family Participation During Home Visit Decision-Making

Moving Toward More Meaningful Family Participation During Home Visit Decision-Making

Reconsidering ‘What Works’ in Welfare-to-Work with the Vulnerable Unemployed: The Potential of Relational Causality as an Alternative Approach

Framing in interactive academic talk

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About