2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.110975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wayside wheel-rail vertical contact force continuous detecting method and its application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most commonly used wheel flat detection method is the stress-based method. In this method, the dynamic stress of the track when the train passes can be measured by different stress sensors such as strain gauges, accelerometers, and fiber Bragg gratings (FBG) [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65].…”
Section: Stress-based Wheel Flat Signal Acquisition Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used wheel flat detection method is the stress-based method. In this method, the dynamic stress of the track when the train passes can be measured by different stress sensors such as strain gauges, accelerometers, and fiber Bragg gratings (FBG) [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65].…”
Section: Stress-based Wheel Flat Signal Acquisition Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu et al 11 built an electromechanical model of a high-speed train transmission system to study the possibilities of using motor current signals instead of vibration signals to identify the wheel flat, wheel OOR and hunting motion. Peng et al 12 developed a wayside calibration device using the continuous wheel-rail force detection method to detect the wheel OOR and wheel offload. The reliability of the device has been verified in an indoor laboratory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sensors do not require significant modification to track components during the installation process. Over the past few decades, research on strain-gauge-based systems for track response monitoring has been noticeable ( 133 ). Although the use of strain-gauge-based systems for train-induced wheel-load measurement is relatively common, only a few studies have recently reported the use of these systems for rail–tie interaction force measurement ( 2, 5, 7, 9, 13, 14, 26, 27, 2933 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, no consistent standard/guideline is available governing the installation/calibration of these strain-gauge-based systems. Based on an extensive review of published literature, calibration fixtures used for these systems can be broadly divided into three categories: (1) rectangular fixtures ( 34 ), (2) triangular fixtures ( 2, 7, 13, 23, 26, 2833, 35 ), (3) direct applications of load against a car-body ( 6 , 15 ). This raises the additional question whether or not the calibration results are affected by the type of calibration fixture used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%