2022
DOI: 10.32604/cmc.2022.027204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WDBM: Weighted Deep Forest Model Based Bearing Fault Diagnosis Method

Abstract: In the research field of bearing fault diagnosis, classical deep learning models have the problems of too many parameters and high computing cost. In addition, the classical deep learning models are not effective in the scenario of small data. In recent years, deep forest is proposed, which has less hyper parameters and adaptive depth of deep model. In addition, weighted deep forest (WDF) is proposed to further improve deep forest by assigning weights for decisions trees based on the accuracy of each decision … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather than requiring a manual feature extraction method, the deep network structure of deep learning may directly extract features from the original vibration signals of bearings. Inspired by the above research, many researchers are interested in developing deep networkbased artificial intelligence algorithms in bearing fault diagnosis [20][21][22][23]. For instance, Lu et al [24] presented a deep neural network embedding maximum mean discrepancy for cross-domain bearing fault identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than requiring a manual feature extraction method, the deep network structure of deep learning may directly extract features from the original vibration signals of bearings. Inspired by the above research, many researchers are interested in developing deep networkbased artificial intelligence algorithms in bearing fault diagnosis [20][21][22][23]. For instance, Lu et al [24] presented a deep neural network embedding maximum mean discrepancy for cross-domain bearing fault identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%