“We are called the et cetera”: experiences of the poor with health financing reforms that target them in Kenya

Abstract

Background Through a number of healthcare reforms, Kenya has demonstrated its intention to extend financial risk protection and service coverage for poor and vulnerable groups. These reforms include the provision of free maternity services, user-fee removal in public primary health facilities and a health insurance subsidy programme (HISP) for the poor. However, the available evidence points to inequity and the likelihood that the poor will still be left behind with regards to financial risk protection and service coverage. This study examined the experiences of the poor with health financing reforms that target them. Methods We conducted a qualitative cross-sectional study in two purposively selected counties in Kenya. We collected data through focus group discussions ( n = 8) and in-depth interviews ( n = 30) with people in the lowest wealth quintile residing in the health and demographic surveillance systems, and HISP beneficiaries. We analyzed the data using a framework approach focusing on four healthcare access dimensions; geographical accessibility, affordability, availability, and acceptability. Results Health financing reforms reduced financial barriers and improved access to health services for the poor in the study counties. However, various access barriers limited the extent to which they benefited from these reforms. Long distances, lack of public transport, poor condition of the roads and high transport costs especially in rural areas limited access to health facilities. Continued charging of user fees despite their abolition, delayed insurance reimbursements to health facilities that HISP beneficiaries were seeking care from, and informal fees exposed the poor to out of pocket payments. Stock-outs of medicine and other medical supplies, dysfunctional medical equipment, shortage of healthcare workers, and frequent strikes adversely affected the availability of health services. Acceptability of care was further limited by discrimination by healthcare workers and ineffective grievance redress mechanisms which led to a feeling of disempowerment among the poor. Conclusions Pro-poor health financing reforms improved access to care for the poor to some extent. However, to enhance the effectiveness of pro-poor reforms and to ensure that the poor in Kenya benefit fully from them, there is a need to address barriers to healthcare seeking across all access dimensions.

Patient costs of diabetes mellitus care in public health care facilities in Kenya

“…This phenomenon has been observed from studies in Uganda and Zambia . Prior studies conducted in Kenya highlight that transport costs are a key access barrier especially to poor patients . Moreover, 36% of patients in the overall sample reported a sick visit outside of scheduled clinic appointments incurring an annual mean cost of KES 38 597 (US$ 378.4).…”

District division administrative disaggregation data framework for monitoring leaving no one behind in the National Health Insurance Fund of Sudan: achieving sustainable development goals in 2030

“…This WHO framework provides national information about equity regarding the utilization of essential health services between average coverage and full coverage and between rich and poor [39]. Research studies disaggregate the data based on gender [40,41], socioeconomic status [42][43][44][45][46], income [47][48][49], marital status [50], residence [51], ethnicity [52], and education [53,54]. This disaggregation facilitates the detection of inequity in health between advantaged and disadvantaged groups.…”

“If the Big Fish are Doing It Then Why Not Me Down Here?”: Informal Fee Payments and Reproductive Health Care Provider Motivation in Kenya

“…Study participants noted that the need to survive sometimes pushes them to extract payments from very poor clients but did not discuss how they cope with the negative emotions that may arise from such practices (Kabia et al. ).…”

“…A recent (2019) qualitative study examined the impact of health financing among those in the lowest wealth quintile in Kenya; participants noted an increased demand for maternal health services after labor and delivery user fees were removed suggesting fees reduce demand for health care services. Study participants noted that the need to survive sometimes pushes them to extract payments from very poor clients but did not discuss how they cope with the negative emotions that may arise from such practices (Kabia et al 2019).…”