2017
DOI: 10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

We are the Process: Reflections on the Underestimation of Power in Students as Partners in Practice

Abstract: The concept of Students as Partners (SaP) has much merit; however, further reflection on the power embedded in daily SaP processes and relationships is needed. In this article, we use the SaP model articulated by Healey, Flint, and Harrington (2014) to examine three reflections of SaP in practice from two different Canadian post-secondary contexts. Informed by critical pedagogical theory and feminist theory, we highlight sites of harmony and dissonance between the Healey, Flint, and Harrington (2014) model (th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the beginning of this process, we knew that an article would be written but we could not have predicted the insights we would glean from the process. Our work contributes to SoTL literature that interrogates spaces of power, positionality, and intersectionality (Chick 2014;Kehler, Verwoord, and Smith 2017;Little, Green, and Felten 2019;Matthews 2017). Through our conversations about living an undivided life we challenge the use of binaries that do not capture the fluidity of identity.…”
Section: What Does This Research Mean For Sotl Scholars?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…At the beginning of this process, we knew that an article would be written but we could not have predicted the insights we would glean from the process. Our work contributes to SoTL literature that interrogates spaces of power, positionality, and intersectionality (Chick 2014;Kehler, Verwoord, and Smith 2017;Little, Green, and Felten 2019;Matthews 2017). Through our conversations about living an undivided life we challenge the use of binaries that do not capture the fluidity of identity.…”
Section: What Does This Research Mean For Sotl Scholars?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…At the beginning of this process, we knew that an article would be written but we could not have predicted the insights we would glean from the process. Our work contributes to SoTL literature that interrogates spaces of power, positionality, and intersectionality (Chick 2014;Kehler, Verwoord, and Smith 2017;Little, Green, and Felten 2019;Matthews 2017). Through our conversations about living an undivided life we challenge the use of binaries that do not capture the fluidity of identity.…”
Section: What Does This Research Mean For Sotl Scholars?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such is the magic of telling our stories through collaborative autoethnography. Collaborative autoethnography, autoethnography, and personal narrative are methods that require vulnerability and courage-they are methods of the heart (Custer 2014;Kehler, Verwoord, and Smith 2017;Sparkes 2007). Scholarly distance is removed as we become our own data.…”
Section: How To Find the Couragementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For some of the peer mentors, however, this level of engagement created a challenge and for some was experienced as an obligation: "it felt sort of pressured, like 'We want you to organize this"' (FG4). Kehler et al (2017) have argued that power dynamics are underestimated in students as partners practice, even in well-intentioned encouragement to participate and to rise to the challenge of becoming equals. Peer mentors construed the encouragement to organise events as pressure, suggesting perhaps that greater attention needs to be paid by staff to the ways in which students perceive requests or suggestions.…”
Section: Perceived Benefits Of the Peer Mentor Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%