2000
DOI: 10.1179/nam.2000.48.1.49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“We Embraced Each Other by Our Names”: Levinas, Derrida, and the Ethics of Naming

Abstract: Emmanuel Levinas’ and Jacques Derrida’ s theories of names and naming are discussed in a context that casts light upon the complex relationships among names and the named on the one hand, and onomastics and other fields and discourses on the other. Such other fields are anthropology, (cultural) history, politics, and ethics. Levinas’ phenomenological view of naming and Derrida's use of Levinas in a markedly “poststructuralist” analysis both stress the moral dimension of onomastic acts, how much is at stake in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most important to this study is how personal and family names correspond to the establishment of identity. Aldrin (2016) asserted that “naming is always a question of assigning identity” (p. 382), and as Moraru (2000) briefly sketched in certain contexts like the Yugoslav wars, names are identities. In less extreme cases, Bodenhorn and Vom Bruck (2006) noted that names are a recognition of personhood, defined as our “conceptions of what persons are and how we should understand and act toward them” (Rose, 1998, p. 11).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most important to this study is how personal and family names correspond to the establishment of identity. Aldrin (2016) asserted that “naming is always a question of assigning identity” (p. 382), and as Moraru (2000) briefly sketched in certain contexts like the Yugoslav wars, names are identities. In less extreme cases, Bodenhorn and Vom Bruck (2006) noted that names are a recognition of personhood, defined as our “conceptions of what persons are and how we should understand and act toward them” (Rose, 1998, p. 11).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naming can also be "linked to our ability to comprehend the world around us" (Stump 1998, 8). It is described as "a process of discovery" (Bodenhorn and vom Bruck 2006, 3) or a means to embrace others (Moraru 2000). Anthropologists have often examined the process of naming as "a way of making connections between groups" (Humphrey 2006, 158).…”
Section: What Is In a Name?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The words one chooses to name can convey judgements beside carrying information. Moraru (2000), influenced by Derrida, looks at naming as a political act because names can "lay out a model of social behavior, of how we (should) treat others" (55). Drawing upon Althusser's theory of interpellation, Humphrey (2006) also refers to the political act of naming when human beings are seen as ideological subjects who "come into existence only by being named" (172) and are hailed or interpellated by those names in social interactions.…”
Section: The Necessity and Possibility Of Re-naming Oneselfmentioning
confidence: 99%