Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The Philippine SOGIE Equality Bill is the longest‐running series of Senate and House proposals filed in the Philippines. Despite academic efforts to analyze its intricacies, little is known about the discursive dimension of its agenda‐setting and the mechanisms behind its persistent deadlock, which exemplifies the phenomenon of policy stagnation. Through critical discourse analysis (CDA) and textual analysis, this study examines the statements of the legislative opposition. In doing so, it reifies Winkel–Leipold's approach to agenda‐setting, which reconceptualizes Kingdon's streams as discursive patterns. The study argues that the stalemate of the Bill is due to the disjunction in the political, policy, and problem streams that take reference from an entrenched socio‐culturally Abrahamic‐oriented landscape of the country, which actively shapes legislative outcomes of unconventional and progressive policies. Proponents may initially try to minimize potential conflicts by utilizing the normative power of such hegemonizing discourse to attain desired policy outcomes amidst existing discourse conditions. Analyzing the Bill's underlying discourses suggests that legal and socio‐cultural transformative change requires addressing overt and covert resistance in policy debates.
The Philippine SOGIE Equality Bill is the longest‐running series of Senate and House proposals filed in the Philippines. Despite academic efforts to analyze its intricacies, little is known about the discursive dimension of its agenda‐setting and the mechanisms behind its persistent deadlock, which exemplifies the phenomenon of policy stagnation. Through critical discourse analysis (CDA) and textual analysis, this study examines the statements of the legislative opposition. In doing so, it reifies Winkel–Leipold's approach to agenda‐setting, which reconceptualizes Kingdon's streams as discursive patterns. The study argues that the stalemate of the Bill is due to the disjunction in the political, policy, and problem streams that take reference from an entrenched socio‐culturally Abrahamic‐oriented landscape of the country, which actively shapes legislative outcomes of unconventional and progressive policies. Proponents may initially try to minimize potential conflicts by utilizing the normative power of such hegemonizing discourse to attain desired policy outcomes amidst existing discourse conditions. Analyzing the Bill's underlying discourses suggests that legal and socio‐cultural transformative change requires addressing overt and covert resistance in policy debates.
Previous work has demonstrated that gay, bisexual men, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) living with HIV are likely to experience intersectional stigma. However, mainstream systems often fail to recognize how power and privilege shape this experience. Such a complex psychological phenomenon requires an in-depth reflective inquiry that acknowledges individuals as experts in their own experiences. To explicate this matter, this study aimed to develop an understanding of how intersectional stigma impacts the experiences of GBM living with HIV and to illuminate how contexts (un)fuel inequities. The semi-structured interviews with five Filipino GBM living with HIV were analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). Exploration of their accounts elucidated how cultural elements fueled power dynamics and privilege, which in turn shaped intersectional stigma and their experiences. Narratives accentuated how Filipino GBM living with HIV situate themselves from victims to agents of change who empower and liberate others in the community. Insights from this study underscore the critical role of collective actions in bridging gaps in inequities and guiding the improvement of policies and interventions that are well-suited to the context and culturally appropriate for people living with HIV and other multiply marginalized populations.
This study aimed to determine whether bullying affects the personal attributes of pupils. 197 Grade 5 and 6 pupils from the School District of Valencia for the School Year 2023–2024 served as respondents. The researcher used a descriptive–correlational research design and a validated questionnaire. The questionnaire underwent a dry run to ensure item content reliability. The researcher also used weighted mean, frequency, and percentage, Pearson product-moment coefficient of correlation, and Kruskal–Wallis H test to analyze the data. The study revealed several findings: (a) the pupils exhibited a very high level of confidence and were not significantly affected by bullying, and (b) the pupils demonstrated high personal attributes. It was found that bullying experiences do not significantly affect or influence the pupils’ attributes. In addition, bullying experiences affect all pupils regardless of their age and sex. Since all the variables have correlation coefficients (r values) greater than the tabular value of 0.1946 at the 0.05 level of significance with 190 degrees of freedom, this demonstrates a significant relationship between the extent to which pupils experience bullying and the personal attributes they manifest, including self-confidence, socialization, school engagement, motivation, and emotional well-being. This implies that bullying can influence a child’s characteristics and behavior. On the other hand, it is revealed that pupils manifest a low extent of the various negative effects of bullying in all personal attributes, particularly self-confidence, socialization, school engagement, emotional well-being, and motivation. The weighted mean of the five personal attributes ranges from 1.84 to 2.43, with a composite mean of 2.06. These results indicate that pupils have high personal attributes. This implies that the personal attributes of the respondents are manifested positively.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.