“We’re Home Now”: How a Rehousing Intervention Shapes the Mental Well-Being of Inuit Adults in Nunavut, Canada

Abstract

This study explores the ways in which a rehousing intervention shapes the mental well-being of Inuit adults living in Nunavut, Canada, where the prevalence of core housing need is four times the national average. More specifically, it compares the housing experiences of participants who were rehoused in a newly built public housing unit, to the experiences of participants on the public housing waitlist. The study was developed in collaboration with organizations based in Nunavut and Nunavik. Semi-structured interviews were transcribed, and a deductive-inductive thematic analysis was performed based on Gidden’s concept of ontological security, and Inuit-specific mental health conceptualization. Twenty-five Inuit adults participated (11 rehoused, 14 waitlist). Three themes were identified to describe how the subjective housing experiences of participants improved their mental well-being after rehousing: (1) refuge creation; (2) self-determination and increased control; (3) improved family dynamics and identity repair. Implicit to these themes are the contrasting housing experiences of participants on the waitlist. Construction initiatives that increase public housing stock and address gaps in the housing continuum across Inuit regions could promote well-being at a population level. However, larger socio-economic problems facing Inuit may hamper beneficial processes stemming from such interventions.

The psychosocial dimension of housing in Nunavik: does social support vary with household crowding?

“…This mediation was significant for women but not for men. More recently, a qualitative study conducted in Nunavut showed that living in overcrowded conditions implies constant negotiations for limited space, food, and water, conditions in which people feel they lack control and that instil a sense of "powerlessness" (Perreault et al, 2022b). The study suggests that this ultimately leads to social tensions that undermine supportive family relationships and mental well-being, a finding consistent with the theoretical model originally proposed by Evans and Lepore (1993).…”

Influences of Cultural Values, Community Cohesiveness, and Resilience Among Residents in Insurgency-Prone Northeast Nigeria

“…These include infrastructure like roads, water supply, sanitation systems, electricity, and additional services vital for individual well-being (King et al, 2017). Moreover, a house is more than a shelter; it is a haven that provides both physical and psychological well-being, fostering the development and social integration of its occupants (WHO, 2004;Perreault et al, 2022). Nonetheless, prevailing challenges in various environmental contexts have heightened awareness regarding the significance of dwellings and their maintenance as integral components of daily life.…”