2017
DOI: 10.1177/1463949117714084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘We’re just gonna scribble it’: The affective and social work of destruction in children’s art-making with different semiotic resources

Abstract: Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge.Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, withou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sakr (2017: 228) explores children’s destruction of their own artwork in order to develop an understanding of ‘the work that destruction can do, and the impact of different semiotic resources on destruction’. She looks at the materialities of destruction, ‘the physical actions that constitute destruction and the “stuff” that gets destroyed’.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Indexical ‘Traces’ and Semiotic Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sakr (2017: 228) explores children’s destruction of their own artwork in order to develop an understanding of ‘the work that destruction can do, and the impact of different semiotic resources on destruction’. She looks at the materialities of destruction, ‘the physical actions that constitute destruction and the “stuff” that gets destroyed’.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Indexical ‘Traces’ and Semiotic Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a social semiotic perspective, actions are judged as meaningful according to the impact they have on unfolding interactions between people (Kress, 2010; Van Leeuwen, 2005). According to this approach, destruction can be seen to be ‘as meaningful as an act that would typically be seen as creative or productive’ (Sakr, 2017: 228). As such, we argue that semiotic acts of destruction deserve more attention from research in multimodality and semiotics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%