2015
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt183pc1b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

We Sell Our Time No More

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lean production emphasizes waste minimization and work flow maximization to increase productivity. Like the high-powered productivity incentives we study, lean production systems have been criticized for their association with intensified workloads and deteriorated working conditions (e.g., Landsbergis et al 1999, Parker 2003, Stewart et al 2009). Yet, recent studies show either mixed relationships (e.g., Jackson andMullarkey 2000, Hasle 2009) or positive relationships (e.g., Locke andRomis 2007, 2010;Distelhorst et al 2016) between lean production and working conditions.…”
Section: Contribution To the Literature On Labor Practices In Global mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lean production emphasizes waste minimization and work flow maximization to increase productivity. Like the high-powered productivity incentives we study, lean production systems have been criticized for their association with intensified workloads and deteriorated working conditions (e.g., Landsbergis et al 1999, Parker 2003, Stewart et al 2009). Yet, recent studies show either mixed relationships (e.g., Jackson andMullarkey 2000, Hasle 2009) or positive relationships (e.g., Locke andRomis 2007, 2010;Distelhorst et al 2016) between lean production and working conditions.…”
Section: Contribution To the Literature On Labor Practices In Global mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the internationalisation of manufacturing during the 1980s and 1990s, HR managers of large automotive companies started convincing union representatives that a mutually benefiting solution was possible if labour would constrain or give up their demands and accept the implementation of “lean-production” techniques, calendar flexibility or dual-wage-scales (Stewart et al , 2008; Las Heras, 2018b). Similar to corporatism, micro-corporatism can be grasped as the recursive production of consent in between capital and labour at the workplace/factory/company scale in order to maintain corporate profitability high and, as a corollary, employment afloat (Zagelmeyer, 2001; Moody, 1997).…”
Section: From “Managers Of Discontent” To “Managers Of Precariousness”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contradictions of trying to incorporate the workforce under a micro-corporatist logic emerged in NZF when dominant unions, especially CCOO, found it impossible to legitimise the 1994 collective agreement in the eyes of critical shop floor workers who were going to directly suffer from greater stress and work intensity (e.g. Stewart et al , 2008). The latter, who had previously been represented by CCOO during the 1970s and 1980s, conceived that they could better defend their class interests by organising a new union branch.…”
Section: From the Democratic Transition Until The Mid-1990s: Qualitative Shift In Collective Bargaining In Nzfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a large body of literature which demonstrates that employee empowerment has a positive effect on job satisfaction and organisational commitment (Fernandez and Moldogaziev, 2013;Kim and Fernandez, 2015;Ogbonnaya and Valizade, 2015), and improves job performance Moldogaziev, 2011 and. Despite these benefits, however, a number of studies in the automobile industry have also pointed out a big gap between management rhetoric and reality regarding employee empowerment (Vidal 2007a;2007b;Stewart et al, 2009;Jones et al, 2013). Having reviewed the relevant literature, Jones et al (2013) concluded that employee involvement and voice in various automobile plants were effectively silenced if they were in conflict with cost reduction and production enhancement, despite claims of employee empowerment by management.…”
Section: The Tension Between Employee Empowerment and Production Enhamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been suggested that there is a tension between management's focus on employee participation and on production enhancement. Research in the automobile industry has revealed that management often prioritises production and merely pays lip service to employee empowerment (Jones et al, 2013;Stewart et al, 2009;Vidal, 2007aVidal, , 2007b). An intriguing question arising, therefore, is how this tension is played out and managed in the context of OHS management in the shipping industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%