“We started talking about race and racism after George Floyd”: insights from research into practitioner preparedness for anti-racist social work practice in England

Abstract

The events of 2020, notably, the murder of George Floyd and the global COVID-19 pandemic, brought issues of race and racism into sharp focus in social work education, research and practice. In the UK, the Black Lives Matter movement contributed to raising awareness of the existence and effects of racism, and the need for anti-racist practice in all areas of social work; yet, surprisingly, some social workers alleged to have first heard the term ‘anti-racist practice’ after the murder of George Floyd, while others claimed a basic understanding of what it meant in practice. This article reports the findings from a qualitative study with 67 social workers about their preparedness for anti-racist practice with service users at the point of qualification and after their assessed and supported year in employment. A proposal for race intentionality as opposed to race evasiveness is made.

Black Lives Matter special edition: Critical and Radical Social Work ten years on

“…The articles by Prospera Tedam and Tam Cane, by Panagiotis Pentaris, Mariam Raja, Sue Hanna and Abiola Oresanya, and by Rojan Afrouz shine a light on the woeful inadequacies of antiracist training and unpreparedness for the complexities of practice in the landscape of intersectional racism. Tedam and Cane (2022) use the concept of 'racism evasiveness' to interrogate findings from their research testimonies of anti-racism teaching being experienced as an 'add-on', 'lip service', 'superficial' and 'not specific or detailed and not standing out', with views that it 'ought to have been longer than one hour'. Tedam and Tam's research exposes the tendencies in social work education to avoid uncomfortable conversations by exploring the broader context of anti-oppressive practice and not anti-racism specifically.…”