2021
DOI: 10.1177/0891243220979636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

We’ve Come a Long Way, Guys! Rhetorics of Resistance to the Feminist Critique of Sexist Language

Abstract: We provide a qualitative analysis of resistance to calls for gender-neutral language. We analyzed more than 900 comments responding to two essays—one on AlterNet and another on Vox posted to the Vox editor’s Facebook page—that critiqued a pervasive male-based generic, “you guys.” Five rhetorics of resistance are discussed: appeals to origins, appeals to linguistic authority, appeals to aesthetics, appeals to intentionality and inclusivity, and appeals to women and feminist authorities. These rhetorics justifie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Others, including those who consider themselves to be gender progressives, may be convinced that the problem with using singular they is strictly grammatical. This position, we suggest, is akin to self-identified feminists who deny the androcentric implications of using the familiar term “you guys” (Kleinman, Copp, and Wilson 2021): In both cases, speakers defend a linguistic practice by denying its political implications. Our analysis demonstrates that using singular they advances gender justice, whereas merely avoiding its use does not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others, including those who consider themselves to be gender progressives, may be convinced that the problem with using singular they is strictly grammatical. This position, we suggest, is akin to self-identified feminists who deny the androcentric implications of using the familiar term “you guys” (Kleinman, Copp, and Wilson 2021): In both cases, speakers defend a linguistic practice by denying its political implications. Our analysis demonstrates that using singular they advances gender justice, whereas merely avoiding its use does not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kemunculan teori kritik sastra feminis dapat dikatakan merupakan sebuah upaya perlawanan para kaum feminis terhadap nasib perempuan dalam dunia sastra yang dipengaruhi oleh kultur patriarki yang menyudutkan perempuan. Dengan demikian, kritik sastra feminis pada dasarnya menolak standar-standar kuno dan dapat digunakan oleh kaum feminis untuk membantu mereka dalam merekonstruksi politik patriarki, salah satunya dalam aspek bahasa (Ohito & Nyachae, 2019;Kleinman, Copp & Wilson, 2021). Dalam penelitian ini, perempuan tidak saja terkait dengan gender, melainkan juga terkait dengan etnisnya, yakni peranakan Tionghoa.…”
Section: Gerakan Perempuan Perilaku Organisasi Dan Kritik Sastra Feminisunclassified
“…They are also embedded in the way racial minorities and immigrants are praised (Estrada et al, 2019). In addition, they are used as a defensive tactic to explain away oppression, legitimize racist practices, and delegitimize social justice efforts (Armenta, 2017; Delgado, 2018; Kleinman et al, 2021; LeChasseur et al, 2020; Sumerau and Grollman, 2018). These forms of racial stupidity were the by-products of all the wrong lessons being taken from the civil rights movement (Fleming 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%