‘We watch porn for the fucking, not for romantic tiptoeing’: extremity, fantasy and women’s porn use

Abstract

This article examines the appeal of extreme imageries through a 2017 journalistic survey of 2438 participants on Finnish women's approaches to, opinions on and preferences in porn, with a specific emphasis on responses addressing preferences deemed extreme. The respondents regularly positioned these pornographic fantasies in relation to the assumed tastes of other women while also addressing the complex and ambivalent roles that porn played in their ways of making sense of their sexual selves. By focusing on disconnections articulated both towards the category of women and within one's sexual self when accounting for the attractions of extremity, this article also questions the 'will to knowledge' underpinning popular queries into women's pornographic likes, asking how such data can be productively explored without reproducing the binary gender logic that structures it.

The metaverse of violence

“… 23 This also pertains to what can be categorized as “nonconsensual porn” acted out in the metaverse ( Annison, 2022 , p. 41); this label appears to be easy to guess, but the content of which appears at least elusive (between unauthorized use of others’ images and coercion on avatars ). For some further reference to the debated constitution of new forms of pornographic expression, see Cole and Maiberg (2022) and Pandey (2022) ; while for some hints at the innovative possibilities of grooming and child molestation, see White (2022) and Park (2022) . Moreover, this also leads to necessary reminders of the uneven amalgam that gives concrete form to charges of exploitation and, also, aiding and abetting prostitution.…”