2017
DOI: 10.1307/mmj/1491465686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak amenability of the central Beurling algebras on [FC]- groups

Abstract: We study weak amenability of central Beurling algebras ZL 1 (G, ω). The investigation is a natural extension of the known work on the commutative Beurling algebra L 1 (G, ω). For [FC] − groups we establish a necessary condition and for [FD] − groups we give sufficient conditions for the weak amenability of ZL 1 (G, ω). For a compactly generated [FC] − group with the polynomial weight ωα(x) = (1 + |x|) α , we prove that ZL 1 (G, ωα) is weakly amenable if and only if α < 1/2.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that [18] generalizes the results of [1,2] and in these three articles the major focus was on studying the amenability and weak amenability properties. The idea behind the proofs given in [18,2] is to use a projection from L 1 (G) onto Z(L 1 (G)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Note that [18] generalizes the results of [1,2] and in these three articles the major focus was on studying the amenability and weak amenability properties. The idea behind the proofs given in [18,2] is to use a projection from L 1 (G) onto Z(L 1 (G)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Note that [18] generalizes the results of [1,2] and in these three articles the major focus was on studying the amenability and weak amenability properties. The idea behind the proofs given in [18,2] is to use a projection from L 1 (G) onto Z(L 1 (G)). Ingenious construction of one such projection is given in [18] which is somewhat different from the usual averaging technique used while working with [FIA] − groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note that since {x : g 1,y (x) = 0} ⊂ U yH (y ∈ Y ) and the family {U yH} y∈Y is locally finite, the sum in the definition of g 1 has only finitely many non-zero terms in a neighborhood of every point. This implies that g 1 is well-defined, and because each g 1,y is continuous, g 1 is also continuous on G. From (27) and the local finiteness of {U yH} y∈Y it follows that (24) holds. The inclusion (25) also holds since it holds for each g 1,y .…”
Section: Beurling Algebra Of Quotient Groupsmentioning
confidence: 92%