2016
DOI: 10.1002/jae.2538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak and Strong Cross‐Sectional Dependence: A Panel Data Analysis of International Technology Diffusion

Abstract: Summary This paper provides an econometric examination of technological knowledge spillovers among countries by focusing on the issue of error cross‐sectional dependence, particularly on the different ways—weak and strong—that this dependence may affect model specification and estimation. A preliminary analysis based on estimation of the exponent of cross‐sectional dependence provides a clear result in favor of strong cross‐sectional dependence. This result has relevant implications in terms of econometric mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(138 reference statements)
3
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Keller The studies that address the impact of trade on technology spillovers give little scope to spatial interdependencies because trade is by nature spatial. Ertur and Musolesi (2013) point this out and estimate an empirical model of R&D spillovers among countries by focusing on the issue of cross-sectional dependence. This paper proposes an alternative method for estimating technology spillovers taking into account spatial interdependencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Keller The studies that address the impact of trade on technology spillovers give little scope to spatial interdependencies because trade is by nature spatial. Ertur and Musolesi (2013) point this out and estimate an empirical model of R&D spillovers among countries by focusing on the issue of cross-sectional dependence. This paper proposes an alternative method for estimating technology spillovers taking into account spatial interdependencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This warns about risks of over-parametrization and inaccurate estimates, which have been documented in previous studies adopting the CCEMG (see, e.g., Ertur andMusolesi, 2017, andEberhardt et al, 2013).…”
Section: Alternative Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, traditional panel estimators provide misleading inferences or inconsistent estimates depending on whether cross-sectional dependence is weak or strong (Chudik et al, 2011;Ertur and Musolesi, 2017).…”
Section: Testing and Measuring Cross-sectional Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heterogeneous effects of these factors may be the result, for instance, of country-specific technological constraints (Ertur and Musolesi 2016). Cross-sectional dependence in the errors of a knowledge production function can also be regarded as a result of spatial effects.…”
Section: Modeling Spatial Dependence Spatial Heterogeneity and Commomentioning
confidence: 99%