2022
DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2022.2060105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak central coherence in adults with ASD: Evidence from eye-tracking and thematic content analysis of social scenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results show that ASD children have more fixation number in localized AOIs instead of global picture. They cannot understand the whole picture of social context, failing to integrate social cues arising from the recognition of emotions in faces or from the environment in order to understand people’s interactions and relationship between social stimuli ( Tsang and Chu, 2018 ; Tassini et al, 2022 ). Second one is both delay in response and shorter fixation time to visual attention to social stimuli, suggesting ASD patients may misinterpret social information and subsequent social cognitive processing because of skipping registering important momentary social information ( Tsang and Chu, 2018 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results show that ASD children have more fixation number in localized AOIs instead of global picture. They cannot understand the whole picture of social context, failing to integrate social cues arising from the recognition of emotions in faces or from the environment in order to understand people’s interactions and relationship between social stimuli ( Tsang and Chu, 2018 ; Tassini et al, 2022 ). Second one is both delay in response and shorter fixation time to visual attention to social stimuli, suggesting ASD patients may misinterpret social information and subsequent social cognitive processing because of skipping registering important momentary social information ( Tsang and Chu, 2018 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, there is an ongoing active debate about its (Goldinger et al, 2016 ; Mahon and Hickok, 2016 ; Greco, 2021 ; Winter et al, 2022 ). Nevertheless, the importance of motor simulation has been suggested as a feature of cognitive processing in individuals with ASD, with weaknesses in central integration (Frith and Happé, 1994 ) and overall A-style weakness that favors attention to detail over partial or global information processing (Happé, 1999 ; Klin et al, 2007 ; Tassini et al, 2022 ). This characteristic has been proposed to exhibit a normal distribution, with strengths varying from weak to strong in non-clinical participants (Moretti and Greco, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When preparing instructions for a neurodiverse group of participants, it is crucial to be as clear, detailed, and multimodal as possible, catering to diverse processing styles. For instance, ASD is associated with a preference for explicit, step-by-step instructions to reduce ambiguity, while those with ADHD may benefit from concise, clearly segmented information to help maintain focus [ 12 , 25 , 28 ]. Similarly, dyslexic participants might find visual instructions more accessible than written ones due to potential reading difficulties [13] .…”
Section: Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%