1993
DOI: 10.1214/aop/1176989125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak Convergence for Reversible Random Walks in a Random Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…which is proved by Kozlov [19], for arbitrary d ≥ 1, when r ω is close enough to a constant, and by Boivin [5], for general r ω , when d = 2, see also some recent related work of Caputo-Ioffe [9]. We describe here this method because in addition to leading to a proof of (0.12), it might apply in a suitable form to the walk on the infinite cluster of percolation and offer a way of removing the restriction d ≥ 4 in (0.8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…which is proved by Kozlov [19], for arbitrary d ≥ 1, when r ω is close enough to a constant, and by Boivin [5], for general r ω , when d = 2, see also some recent related work of Caputo-Ioffe [9]. We describe here this method because in addition to leading to a proof of (0.12), it might apply in a suitable form to the walk on the infinite cluster of percolation and offer a way of removing the restriction d ≥ 4 in (0.8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…[19], see also [2] when the starting point is smoothed out by randomization, and for general r ω (·, ·), when d = 1, 2, see [5]. A quenched central limit theorem for the position of the walk at a single time is otherwise shown for general r ω (·, ·) and arbitrary d ≥ 1, in Boivin-Depauw [6].…”
Section: Remark 12mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Estimate (57) implies the following L ∞ -estimate on χ jχ j L ∞ (B(n)) sup z∈B(m) B(⌊ n m ⌋z,⌊ n m ⌋)) ω(∇Φ j ) 2 B(⌊ n m ⌋z,2⌊ n m ⌋)) + χ j L 1 (B(⌊ n m ⌋z,2⌊ n m ⌋)) B(⌊ n m ⌋z,⌊ n m ⌋)) ω(∇Φ j ) 2 B(⌊ n m ⌋z,2⌊ n m ⌋)) + m d χ j L 1 (B(2n) + ⌊ n m ⌋. (58)The ergodic theorem in the versions(18) and (56) implies that P-a.s. (B(⌊ n m ⌋z,⌊ n m ⌋)) ω(∇Φ j ) 2 ), (59) and the L 1 -sublinearity of χ j (15), we obtain lim sup…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%