2018
DOI: 10.3390/sym10070243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak Fault Detection for Gearboxes Using Majorization–Minimization and Asymmetric Convex Penalty Regularization

Abstract: It is a primary challenge in the fault diagnosis community of the gearbox to extract the weak fault features under heavy background noise and nonstationary conditions. For this purpose, a novel weak fault detection approach based on majorization-minimization (MM) and asymmetric convex penalty regularization (ACPR) is proposed in this paper. The proposed objective cost function (OCF) consisting of a signal-fidelity term, and two parameterized penalty terms (i.e., one is an asymmetric nonconvex penalty regulariz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The source of the problem lies in the establishment of penalty functions, because the symmetric and asymmetric penalty functions are contained and developed for the ACPR method, and as the establishment of the asymmetric function is random, those penalty functions may not be appropriate for such data. In previous research [35], another non-convex penalty regularization approach, namely the asymmetric convex penalty regularization (ACPR) method, was proposed for weak fault detection for gearboxes. To explore the advantage of the proposed approach over the ACPR method, the diagnosis results under same operation environments are compared, the ACPR method is introduced to process the same data that collected from the right side and left side of the input shaft, respectively, and the rules of parameter settings are based on the reference [35].…”
Section: Experimental Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The source of the problem lies in the establishment of penalty functions, because the symmetric and asymmetric penalty functions are contained and developed for the ACPR method, and as the establishment of the asymmetric function is random, those penalty functions may not be appropriate for such data. In previous research [35], another non-convex penalty regularization approach, namely the asymmetric convex penalty regularization (ACPR) method, was proposed for weak fault detection for gearboxes. To explore the advantage of the proposed approach over the ACPR method, the diagnosis results under same operation environments are compared, the ACPR method is introduced to process the same data that collected from the right side and left side of the input shaft, respectively, and the rules of parameter settings are based on the reference [35].…”
Section: Experimental Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous research [35], another non-convex penalty regularization approach, namely the asymmetric convex penalty regularization (ACPR) method, was proposed for weak fault detection for gearboxes. To explore the advantage of the proposed approach over the ACPR method, the diagnosis results under same operation environments are compared, the ACPR method is introduced to process the same data that collected from the right side and left side of the input shaft, respectively, and the rules of parameter settings are based on the reference [35]. The sparse component of right-side of input shaft generated by the ACPR method is shown in Figure 14a, and its envelop spectrum is shown in Figure 14b.…”
Section: Experimental Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is of great significance to identify the weak fault features at an incipient stage before the fault develops to a serious degree. Incipient fault detection is important to ensure the normal operation of equipment and avoid economic losses [6]- [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second problem is the fault detection method. At present, there are many works of literature about fault detection methods [10][11][12]. Among these, a majority are based on similarity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%