1992
DOI: 10.1016/0304-8853(92)91084-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak ferromagnetism in ‘non-magnetic’ austenitic stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a shift, called the exchange-bias effect, was commonly observed in other austenitic stainless steels and has characteristics similar to those found previously. [19][20][21] Note that a detailed investigation of the exchange-bias effect is beyond the scope of our study and the results, which will appear elsewhere, are not shown here; the exchange bias effect was not observed in the present minor-loop measurements using a fluxmeter, because the set of minor loops was measured after demagnetization. The exchange coupling between the magnetic moments of ferromagnetic ␣Ј martensites and antiferromagnetic austenitic matrix can lead to the appearance of a kink in W m 0 at around T = 40-50 K as well as H c at T N , as shown in Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Such a shift, called the exchange-bias effect, was commonly observed in other austenitic stainless steels and has characteristics similar to those found previously. [19][20][21] Note that a detailed investigation of the exchange-bias effect is beyond the scope of our study and the results, which will appear elsewhere, are not shown here; the exchange bias effect was not observed in the present minor-loop measurements using a fluxmeter, because the set of minor loops was measured after demagnetization. The exchange coupling between the magnetic moments of ferromagnetic ␣Ј martensites and antiferromagnetic austenitic matrix can lead to the appearance of a kink in W m 0 at around T = 40-50 K as well as H c at T N , as shown in Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…In our case an increasing of χ(T ) could be explained by similar mechanism. As the AISI steel materials are expected to possess a long-range antiferromagnetic (AFM) interaction between magnetic species [15], an increase in temperature causes destroying of overall AFM order and ferromagnetic (FM) imperfection of the structure appears. Additional discussion of this question will be presented later in the present paper, after its supplementation with SQUID measurement results.…”
Section: Epr-fmr Resonance Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, it is apparent that the loop is shifted in the horizontally negative direction. The origin of this shift along the field axis is ascribed to the exchange contact at the boundary or interface of ␣Ј martensite in austenitic matrix, [4][5][6] i.e., the microscopic torque is exerted by the AFM spins to the spins in the FM while reversing the magnetization of FM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 However, such an exchange interaction is not commonly seen in the crystalline alloys which was first reported on cold-worked-type 347 stainless steel by Meiklejohn. 4 Although few studies have mentioned such exchange interaction between the strain-induced FM and austenitic phase in stainless steels, 5,6 there is no detailed information on the extent of such exchange contact as a function of ␣Ј martensite volume fraction. In summary, the possible AFM/FM interactions in austenitic steels have received less attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%