2019
DOI: 10.1002/num.22373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak Galerkin finite element methods for a fourth order parabolic equation

Abstract: This paper is devoted to a newly developed weak Galerkin finite element method with the stabilization term for a linear fourth order parabolic equation, where weakly defined Laplacian operator over discontinuous functions is introduced. Priori estimates are developed and analyzed in L2 and an H2 type norm for both semi‐discrete and fully discrete schemes. And finally, numerical examples are provided to confirm the theoretical results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking expectation on both sides of (64), together with the definitions (16) and (17), the first inequality of (62) is provided.…”
Section: Theorem 4 Under the Assumption Of Eorem 3 We Havementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taking expectation on both sides of (64), together with the definitions (16) and (17), the first inequality of (62) is provided.…”
Section: Theorem 4 Under the Assumption Of Eorem 3 We Havementioning
confidence: 99%
“…en, the WG method is successfully applied to elliptic interface problems [11,12] and linear parabolic problems [13][14][15][16] and further developed for other applications, such as biharmonic problems [17][18][19][20][21][22], Cahn-Hilliard problems [23], and Stokes problems [24][25][26][27][28][29]. To ensure the method is highly flexible in element construction and mesh generation, the idea of a stabilization term is introduced in [30], which allows for arbitrary piecewise polynomial shape functions in deformed and honeycomb meshes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field of fluid mechanics includes numerous partial differential equations (PDEs) essential for studying fluid dynamics. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) uses numerical analysis and data structures to analyze and solve fluid flow problems, incorporating various numerical solving methods such as the finite element method [ 1 ], finite volume method [ 2 ], and spectral methods [ 3 ]. Despite significant advancements over recent decades, these methods often face complexities due to mesh division in practical applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In physics and engineering, many important physical models are described as partial differential equations (PDEs), such as Navier–Stokes equations [ 4 ] for fluid mechanics and Maxwell equations [ 5 ] for electromagnetic field theory. When solving partial differential equations using traditional numerical methods, such as the Finite Difference Method (FDM) [ 6 ], Finite Element Method (FEM) [ 7 ], Finite Volume Method (FVM) [ 8 ], Radial Basis Function Method (RBF) [ 9 ], etc., problems such as high computational costs and the curse of dimensionality are often encountered. Over the last few years, the use of machine learning to solve partial differential equations has also rapidly expanded [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%