2020
DOI: 10.1111/mec.15748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak genetic signal for phenotypic integration implicates developmental processes as major regulators of trait covariation

Abstract: Phenotypic integration (i.e. the degree of covariation among traits) is an important and ubiquitous feature of multicellular organisms that shapes functionality within and among structures. Integration can permit or limit the accumulation of morphological variation by partitioning traits into distinct subunits (i.e. modules) and then varying the degree of association among these subunits (Goswami et al., 2014; Klingenberg, 2008). Recent research has demonstrated that differences among populations in the patter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, much of the study of evolutionary innovation has focused on extrinsic drivers, such as ecological change or environmental stimuli, which have frequently been viewed as the principal triggers for evolutionary novelty ( 6 9 ). Recently, focus has shifted toward the effects of intrinsic (e.g., developmental) processes that may structure patterns of trait diversification ( 10 12 ). Among these processes, integration and modularity have emerged as important sources of insight as a growing consensus has found that patterns of trait covariation can constrain and facilitate responses to selection and strongly influence patterns of trait diversification at both contemporary and macroevolutionary timescales ( 13 20 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, much of the study of evolutionary innovation has focused on extrinsic drivers, such as ecological change or environmental stimuli, which have frequently been viewed as the principal triggers for evolutionary novelty ( 6 9 ). Recently, focus has shifted toward the effects of intrinsic (e.g., developmental) processes that may structure patterns of trait diversification ( 10 12 ). Among these processes, integration and modularity have emerged as important sources of insight as a growing consensus has found that patterns of trait covariation can constrain and facilitate responses to selection and strongly influence patterns of trait diversification at both contemporary and macroevolutionary timescales ( 13 20 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we provide evidence that African cichlid trophic evolution has generally occurred within the context of a coupled jaw system, a trend that was also recently noted in New World cichlids 14 . We demonstrate further that LOJ-LPJ integration may be due, at least in part, to pleiotropy, a phenomenon that is commonly theorized to determine patterns of covariation and limit evolvability (i.e., 9 , 65 but see 60 ). We postulate that integration between LOJ-LPJ shapes in cichlids is not a constraint, but rather an attribute that promotes rapid shifts in foraging niche 33 , 66 , an ability that should be particularly advantageous in young and/or dynamic environments similar to the East African Rift-Valley.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Another consequence of genetic, developmental, and functional constraints is phenotypic integration, whereby seemingly independent traits vary in unison. While determining the origins of integration has proved difficult (i.e., 60 ), trait integration can facilitate or limit morphological evolution depending on the direction of selection 2 . While phenotypic integration is a population-level metric, integration can have far-reaching effects on macroevolutionary processes such as taxonomic diversification, extinction, and morphological evolution 3 , 7 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasticity can impact the strength of integration among modules (Anderson et al, 2014), although how plasticity impacts the pattern of modularity is unclear. Recent studies suggest bone remodelling may operate within an existing modularity pattern (Conith et al, 2020) and that modularity patterns could be determined early in development (Conith et al, 2021). If modularity is determined early in development and becomes canalized, then it may preclude marsupials from obtaining placental‐like modularity patterns via plasticity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical loading experienced by marsupial neonates during suckling could produce patterns of modularity in the jaw that reflects the locations of functional inputs, overwriting the initial pattern derived from genetic signals (i.e. Conith et al, 2021) and producing different patterns of modularity between marsupial and placental mammals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%