1996
DOI: 10.1086/177537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak Gravitational Lensing by Galaxies

Abstract: Galaxies are biased tracers of the matter density on cosmological scales. For future tests of galaxy models, we refine and assess a method to measure galaxy biasing as function of physical scale k with weak gravitational lensing. This method enables us to reconstruct the galaxy bias factor b(k) as well as the galaxy-matter correlation r(k) on spatial scales between 0.01 h Mpc −1 k 10 h Mpc −1 for redshift-binned lens galaxies below redshift z 0.6. In the refinement, we account for an intrinsic alignment of sou… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

18
497
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 414 publications
(516 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
18
497
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The earliest astrophysically interesting upper limit was that of Tyson et al (1984), who used the images of 200,000 galaxies measured by the now-obsolete method of digitizing photographic plates to exclude extended isothermal halos with v c > 200 km s −1 around an apparent magnitude-limited sample of galaxies. Galaxy-galaxy lensing was observed at ∼ 4σ by Brainerd et al (1996), the first clear detection of cosmological weak lensing. Their analysis used a total of 3202 lens-source pairs in a field of area 0.025 deg 2 .…”
Section: Galaxy-galaxy Lensing As a Cosmological Probementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earliest astrophysically interesting upper limit was that of Tyson et al (1984), who used the images of 200,000 galaxies measured by the now-obsolete method of digitizing photographic plates to exclude extended isothermal halos with v c > 200 km s −1 around an apparent magnitude-limited sample of galaxies. Galaxy-galaxy lensing was observed at ∼ 4σ by Brainerd et al (1996), the first clear detection of cosmological weak lensing. Their analysis used a total of 3202 lens-source pairs in a field of area 0.025 deg 2 .…”
Section: Galaxy-galaxy Lensing As a Cosmological Probementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB), for instance, was first detected (Smith et al 2007) by cross-correlating noisy CMB lensing maps with a catalog of radio galaxies. Similarly, in the context of galaxy lensing, the cross-correlation of lensing induced shearing of background galaxies with the positions of foreground galaxies (known as galaxy-galaxy lensing) was detected (Brainerd et al 1996) before shearshear correlations (Bacon et al 2000;Kaiser et al 2000;Van Waerbeke et al 2000;Wittman et al 2000). Furthermore, lensing-tracer cross-correlation measurements are typically less sensitive to additive systematic errors since these will tend to average to zero in the cross-correlation (assuming the sources of systematic error are uncorrelated between the lensing measurements and the tracer measurements, often a reasonable approximation).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Brainerd, Blandford & Smail 1996;Hudson et al 1998;Hoekstra et al 2004). In particular, Hoekstra et al (2004) report the detection of finite truncation radii based on the imaging data from the Red-Sequence Cluster Survey.…”
Section: Galaxy-galaxy Lensing Constraints On Field Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we focus on the statistical mass estimates of field and cluster early-type galaxies obtained using weak gravitational lensing. Galaxy-galaxy lensing, the preferential alignment of faint background galaxies around bright foreground galaxies, was originally proposed as a method to constrain the masses and spatial extents of field galaxies (Brainerd, Blandford & Smail 1996), but has since been very successfully extended and applied inside clusters (Natarajan & Kneib 1996;Natarajan et al 1998;2002a). Constraints from this technique are statistical and probe the mass profiles at large radii, typically r >> 0.1r v ir .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%