2015
DOI: 10.1080/03081087.2015.1028320
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak-local derivations and homomorphisms on C*-algebras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof. By [8,Theorem 3.4] it is enough to prove that ∆ is linear. This linearity certainly holds if and only if δ t ∆ is linear for all t ∈ Ω.…”
Section: Weak-2-local Derivations On C(ω) ⊗ Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. By [8,Theorem 3.4] it is enough to prove that ∆ is linear. This linearity certainly holds if and only if δ t ∆ is linear for all t ∈ Ω.…”
Section: Weak-2-local Derivations On C(ω) ⊗ Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 4.3 in [1] implies that T is a (continuous) Jordan * -homomorphism on B(H). A remarkable result of E. Størmer, assures that T is a * -homomorphism or a * -anti-homomorphism (cf.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the terminology in [1], every mapping T in the hypothesis of this Theorem is a extreme-strong-local * -automorphism on B(H). Theorem 4.3 in [1] implies that T is a (continuous) Jordan * -homomorphism on B(H).…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations