2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.01.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak mantle in NW India probed by geodetic measurements following the 2001 Bhuj earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mandal and Pandey () also proposed a thin lithosphere (∼70 km) beneath the KSZ and suggested that this might have resulted from the lithosphere and Deccan/Reunion plume interaction at 65 Ma. Further, Chandrasekhar et al () supported the idea of thermal weakening beneath the KSZ on the basis of geodetic measurements and explained the low viscous strength of the mantle in terms of interaction of the Indian plate with the mantle plume. Hence, it is possible that the plume head material would reach the surface wherever the lithosphere is thin, which may be significantly displaced from the center.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Mandal and Pandey () also proposed a thin lithosphere (∼70 km) beneath the KSZ and suggested that this might have resulted from the lithosphere and Deccan/Reunion plume interaction at 65 Ma. Further, Chandrasekhar et al () supported the idea of thermal weakening beneath the KSZ on the basis of geodetic measurements and explained the low viscous strength of the mantle in terms of interaction of the Indian plate with the mantle plume. Hence, it is possible that the plume head material would reach the surface wherever the lithosphere is thin, which may be significantly displaced from the center.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In order to estimate what proportion of the slip deficit has been recovered we need to estimate the amount of shallow afterslip that occurred between the main shock in February 2006 and the start of ALOS data acquisition in December 2006. One method of making this estimate is to make assumptions regarding the functional form of the surface deformation [e.g., Fialko , 2004; Chandrasekhar et al , 2009]. The Envisat data shows that the average rate of deformation between 74 and 109 days after the main shock (0.6 mm/day) was considerably faster than the roughly linear rate of 0.05 mm/day seen in the ALOS data.…”
Section: Postseismic Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But there are a few researchers (e.g. Likhar et al 2006, Chandrasekhar et al 2009) who have used GPS and European Remote Sensing Satellite (ERS)-SAR data sets, but of different time periods (2001-2003 and 2002-2004, respectively) and of different locations, which do not match with our ENVISAT-ASAR data time periods (2003-2004 and 2004-2005) and location. Therefore, comparisons of post-seismic ground deformation could not be compared with the published results.…”
Section: The Insar Data Set and Processingmentioning
confidence: 80%