2004
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.93.120402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak Measurements with Arbitrary Probe States

Abstract: The exact conditions on valid pointer states for weak measurements are derived. It is demonstrated that weak measurements can be performed with any pointer state with vanishing probability current density. This condition is found both for weak measurements of noncommuting observables and for c-number observables. In addition, the interaction between pointer and object must be sufficiently weak. There is no restriction on the purity of the pointer state. For example, a thermal pointer state is fully valid.PACS … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Weak measurements may be performed in exactly the same way as standard von Neumann measurements, but with a weakened interaction [3]. In a weak measurement, the pointer will on average register the expectation value of the observable that is measured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weak measurements may be performed in exactly the same way as standard von Neumann measurements, but with a weakened interaction [3]. In a weak measurement, the pointer will on average register the expectation value of the observable that is measured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4.3). These expressions can be further simplified if the initial apparatus state has a real φ(q) [45,46] and vanishing expectation value of p, in which case the posterior expectation p ≺ and the correlation {∆p, ∆A} ≺ vanish. Under such conditions, the first two central moments of (4.5) are indistinguishable from those obtained from classically averaging weak values with a variability defined through the posterior distribution (4.3).…”
Section: Quantum Averages Of Weak Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These developments in the field of weak measurement may be especially significant in the context of new experimental possibilities pioneered by quantum information related research [9,10,11]. However, there seems to be a certain mismatch between the conventional approach to weak measurements, which is based on the notion of measurement interaction dynamics mediated by operator observables [12,13,14,15,16], and the more general approach to measurements based on the measurement operators widely used in quantum information [17]. In particular, the conventional analysis seems to overemphasize the exotic and surprising aspects of the weak measurements, while the operator based approach shows more clearly how weak measurements fit into the general framework of quantum physics [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%