2006
DOI: 10.1038/nature04701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population

Abstract: Biological networks have so many possible states that exhaustive sampling is impossible. Successful analysis thus depends on simplifying hypotheses, but experiments on many systems hint that complicated, higher-order interactions among large groups of elements have an important role. Here we show, in the vertebrate retina, that weak correlations between pairs of neurons coexist with strongly collective behaviour in the responses of ten or more neurons. We find that this collective behaviour is described quanti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

80
2,317
5
11

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,607 publications
(2,480 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
80
2,317
5
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Such input most likely contributes to experimentally observed correlations between the activities of neighboring neurons across sensory systems (Meister et al 1995;Averbeck and Lee 2006). While there is still an ongoing debate on whether these correlations are beneficial or detrimental for information transmission, it is widely agreed that their presence will significantly alter the way that information is transmitted by neural populations and its subsequent decoding by higherorder neurons (Nirenberg et al 2001;Schneidman et al 2003Schneidman et al , 2006Latham and Nirenberg 2005;. How nonrenewal spike train statistics affect correlated activity among neurons is an interesting topic that has been largely overlooked so far.…”
Section: Nonrenewal Spike Train Statistics and Population Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such input most likely contributes to experimentally observed correlations between the activities of neighboring neurons across sensory systems (Meister et al 1995;Averbeck and Lee 2006). While there is still an ongoing debate on whether these correlations are beneficial or detrimental for information transmission, it is widely agreed that their presence will significantly alter the way that information is transmitted by neural populations and its subsequent decoding by higherorder neurons (Nirenberg et al 2001;Schneidman et al 2003Schneidman et al , 2006Latham and Nirenberg 2005;. How nonrenewal spike train statistics affect correlated activity among neurons is an interesting topic that has been largely overlooked so far.…”
Section: Nonrenewal Spike Train Statistics and Population Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With increased oscillatory synaptic inputs and/or soma- todendritic coupling there would be increased probability and power of oscillatory spike activity. Even in the cases where there was only a small number of oscillatory neurons, their activity could still produce a significant effect on STN target nuclei because a weak correlation among very many neurons could add up to become prominent at the population level (Schneidman et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Covariance measurements are also important when examining how sensory information is represented. This is true both when relative spike timing is hypothesized to convey information [e.g., 17], and in the more traditional case of rate coding, where correlations may affect the accuracy of the representation [18][19][20][21]. Although many of the above issues can be addressed via recordings from multiple conventional electrodes [e.g., 22], implanted-arrays have an advantage both in isolation stability and in scale (the number of comparable pairs scales as the square of the number of recorded neurons).…”
Section: General Motivations For Implanted-array Recordingmentioning
confidence: 99%