1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0370-2693(98)00225-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak radiative B-meson decay beyond leading logarithms [Phys. Lett. B 400 (1997) 206]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

37
575
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 397 publications
(613 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
37
575
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the meanwhile, the branching ratio for this decay has become quite precise through the subsequent measurements by the CLEO [3], ALEPH [4] and BELLE [5] collaborations, with the BABAR measurements keenly awaited. The present experimental average of the branching ratio B(B → X s γ) = (3.22 ± 0.40) × 10 −4 is in good agreement with the next-to-leading order prediction of the same in the standard model (SM), estimated as B(B → X s γ) SM = (3.35 ± 0.30) × 10 −4 [6,7] for the pole quark mass ratio m c /m b = 0.29 ± 0.02, rising to B(B → X s γ) SM = (3.73 ± 0.30) × 10 −4 [8], if one uses the input value m MS c (µ)/m pole b = 0.22 ± 0.04, where m MS c (µ) is the charm quark mass in the MS-scheme, evaluated at a scale µ in the range m c < µ < m b . The inherent uncertainty reflects in part the present accuracy of the theoretical branching ratio, which is limited to O(α s ), and in part the imprecise measurements of the photon energy spectrum in B → X s γ decays.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In the meanwhile, the branching ratio for this decay has become quite precise through the subsequent measurements by the CLEO [3], ALEPH [4] and BELLE [5] collaborations, with the BABAR measurements keenly awaited. The present experimental average of the branching ratio B(B → X s γ) = (3.22 ± 0.40) × 10 −4 is in good agreement with the next-to-leading order prediction of the same in the standard model (SM), estimated as B(B → X s γ) SM = (3.35 ± 0.30) × 10 −4 [6,7] for the pole quark mass ratio m c /m b = 0.29 ± 0.02, rising to B(B → X s γ) SM = (3.73 ± 0.30) × 10 −4 [8], if one uses the input value m MS c (µ)/m pole b = 0.22 ± 0.04, where m MS c (µ) is the charm quark mass in the MS-scheme, evaluated at a scale µ in the range m c < µ < m b . The inherent uncertainty reflects in part the present accuracy of the theoretical branching ratio, which is limited to O(α s ), and in part the imprecise measurements of the photon energy spectrum in B → X s γ decays.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The bremsstrahlung corrections and the necessary virtual corrections, in order to cancel the infrared divergence, are included in the term A [24].…”
Section: B Mass Matrix Of the Kk Modes For The Top And Bottom Quarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 2HDM, the up-type and the down-type quarks couple either to the same Higgs doublet (this is known as the 2HDM-I), or they could couple to different doublets (2HDM-II). One of the most stringent test of the 2HDM type I and type II comes from the measurement of the b → sγ decay rate which receives substantial enhancement (over the SM prediction) in the 2HDM in a large region of the (m H ± , tan β) parameter space [13,14,15]. The measured b → sγ decay rate from CLEO [16] and ALEPH [17] leads to a model dependent indirect lower bound of the charged Higgs mass as function of tan β [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%