1999
DOI: 10.1143/ptp.102.645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak Radiative Decay  b ->    and Quark-Confined Effects in the Covariant Oscillator Quark Model

Abstract: Motivated by the observation of the decay B → K * γ by the CLEO collaboration, we have systematically analyzed the weak radiative decay Λ b → Λ γ, evaluating the confined effects of quarks in the covariant oscillator quark model. This decay process receives both short distance (electromagnetic penguins at the one loop level) and long distance contributions in the quark level. The long distance contributions are analyzed using the vector meson dominance (VMD) method. The estimated branching ratio is found to be… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this table we see that, within the errors, our result is consistent with those of QCD sum rules [56,57] and a special current [59] and exactly the same with pole model's prediction [60]. However, our prediction differs considerably from these of light-cone QCD sum rules [55], covariant oscillator quark model (COQM) [58] and Ioffe current [59]. The difference between our SM prediction on the branching ratio with that of Ref.…”
Section: Decay Width and Branching Ratiosupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From this table we see that, within the errors, our result is consistent with those of QCD sum rules [56,57] and a special current [59] and exactly the same with pole model's prediction [60]. However, our prediction differs considerably from these of light-cone QCD sum rules [55], covariant oscillator quark model (COQM) [58] and Ioffe current [59]. The difference between our SM prediction on the branching ratio with that of Ref.…”
Section: Decay Width and Branching Ratiosupporting
confidence: 86%
“…1, we see that there are distinctive differences between the SM predictions and those of the UED models, especially the UED6 for N KK ¼ 15, at small values of the [55] ð0:63 À 0:73Þ Â 10 À5 Three-point QCD sum rule [56] ð3:1 AE 0:6Þ Â 10 À5 QCD sum rule [57] ð3:7 AE 0:5Þ Â 10 À5 COQM [58] 0:23 Â 10 À5 Special current [59] ð1:99 þ0:34 À0:31 Þ Â 10 À5 Ioffe current [59] ð0:61 þ0:14 À0:13 Þ Â 10 À6 Pole model [60] ð1:0 À 4:5Þ Â 10 À5 PDG [54] <1:3 Â 10 À3 (CL ¼ 90%Þ compactification factor 1=R. These differences exist in the lower limits obtained by different FCNC transitions in the UED5 and UED6, cosmological constraints, electroweak precision tests [25,29,31,32], and the latest results of the Higgs search at the LHC and of the electroweak precision data for the S and T parameters [34]; however, they become small when 1=R approaches 1 TeV.…”
Section: Decay Width and Branching Ratiomentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Unlike mesonic decays, the investigations of FCNC b → s transition for bottom baryonic decays Λ b → Λγ and Λ b → Λl + l − [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] are much behind because more degrees of freedom are involved in the bound state of baryon system at the quark level. It should be pointed out that such baryonic decays can offer the unique ground to extract the helicity structure of effective…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work we study Λ b → Λγ. In this decay more experimental information about the heavy b quark inside the hadron which is not available in inclusive and mesonic b-hadron decays, such as spin polarization during hadronization, and the handedness of the couplings at the quark level, can be extracted [9,10,11,12,13]. Therefore the baryonic b-hadron radiative decay can provide a new test for theoretical methods for b-quark hadronization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%