2020
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.102.062801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak scaling of the contact distance between two fluctuating interfaces with system size

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing this distance considerably, however, comes at great computational cost for two reasons: first, the contact distance scales logarithmically with the size of the simulation box. 71 Second, increasing the size of the simulation box slows down the diffusion of the two interfaces, which, in turn, sharply increases the length of the required trajectories. The system size with interface areas of 23.3 × 22.0 Å 2 was chosen as a compromise between maximizing the contact distance between the two interfaces and minimizing the simulation time required to obtain trajectories.…”
Section: Slab-geometry Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing this distance considerably, however, comes at great computational cost for two reasons: first, the contact distance scales logarithmically with the size of the simulation box. 71 Second, increasing the size of the simulation box slows down the diffusion of the two interfaces, which, in turn, sharply increases the length of the required trajectories. The system size with interface areas of 23.3 × 22.0 Å 2 was chosen as a compromise between maximizing the contact distance between the two interfaces and minimizing the simulation time required to obtain trajectories.…”
Section: Slab-geometry Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A larger simulation cell would yield a larger, and more realistic, contact distance. Increasing this distance considerably, however, comes at great computational cost, for two reasons: first, the contact distance scales logarithmically with the size of the simulation box 70 . Secondly, increasing the size of the simulation box slows down the diffusion of the two interfaces which in turn sharply increases the length of the required trajectories.…”
Section: Slab-geometry Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morizt et al studied how the minimal distance leading to contact between two fluctuating surfaces evolves with the system size. 9 In the case of thin films, Sheludko and Vrij discussed two opposite effects of thickness fluctuations promoted by thermal or mechanical perturbations. The increase of the surface and the curvature leads to a decrease of the local capillary pressure, while the modifications of the local thickness affect the disjunction pressure.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the rupture mechanism (and thus the moment at which the droplets in close contact actually start to merge) is, to date, still difficult to predict. Morizt et al studied how the minimal distance leading to contact between two fluctuating surfaces evolves with the system size . In the case of thin films, Sheludko and Vrij discussed two opposite effects of thickness fluctuations promoted by thermal or mechanical perturbations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%