A Celebration of Mathematical Modeling 2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-0427-4_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak Shock Reflection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The supersonic patches obtained in the solutions in [8,18,19] appeared to confirm Guderley's four wave solution. The patch indicates that it is plausible for an expansion fan to be an unobserved part of the observed three-shock confluence, since the flow must be supersonic for an expansion wave to occur.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The supersonic patches obtained in the solutions in [8,18,19] appeared to confirm Guderley's four wave solution. The patch indicates that it is plausible for an expansion fan to be an unobserved part of the observed three-shock confluence, since the flow must be supersonic for an expansion wave to occur.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The first indication that Guderley's proposed resolution might be essentially correct was contained in numerical solutions of shock reflection problems for the unsteady transonic small disturbance equations (UTSDE) in [8] and the compressible Euler equations in [18]. Solutions containing a supersonic patch embedded in the subsonic flow directly behind the triple point in a weak shock Mach reflection were presented there.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In self-similar flow this would amount to non-uniqueness for an initial-value problem. Indeed, [6,7] has found a set of initial data for the 2d Euler equations (both isentropic and non-isentropic) that appears to have two solutions, one theoretical, the other clearly different and observed in all numerical calculations 16 For isentropic Euler, a rigorous proof of a different non-uniqueness example has recently been proposed [19]. 13 also referred to as mechanical equilibrum criterion in some contexts 14 Even in Euler flow it applies only for large M 1 , for example M 1 > 2.2... for γ = 7/5.…”
Section: Other Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 also referred to as mechanical equilibrum criterion in some contexts 14 Even in Euler flow it applies only for large M 1 , for example M 1 > 2.2... for γ = 7/5. 15 stability under perturbations to the initial data 16 In addition it is shown that the Godunov scheme can converge to either solution, depending on the grid. However, both results depend strongly on vorticity; uniqueness for the potential flow Cauchy problem is still expected and hysteresis is unlikely except as a transient phenomenon.…”
Section: Other Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%