2007
DOI: 10.4310/mrl.2007.v14.n2.a6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak type (1,1) estimates for a class of discrete rough maximal functions

Abstract: We prove weak type (1, 1) estimate for the maximal function associated with the sequence [m α ], 1 < α < 1 + 1 1000 . As a consequence, the sequence [m α ] is universally L 1 -good.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We give sufficient conditions for maximal truncations of discrete singular integral operators to have sparse bounds. Our argument has as its antecedents the Fefferman [13] and Christ [3] T T * approach to proving weak-type (1, 1) bounds for rough singular integral operators on Euclidean space; this approach has already appeared in the discrete context in the work of LaVictoire [19] where ℓ 1 → ℓ 1,∞ endpoint estimates for certain (random) maximal functions are proven, and in Urban and Zienkiewicz [24] and Mirek [20] where endpoint estimates for (deterministic) maximal functions taken over "thin" subsets of the integers are established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We give sufficient conditions for maximal truncations of discrete singular integral operators to have sparse bounds. Our argument has as its antecedents the Fefferman [13] and Christ [3] T T * approach to proving weak-type (1, 1) bounds for rough singular integral operators on Euclidean space; this approach has already appeared in the discrete context in the work of LaVictoire [19] where ℓ 1 → ℓ 1,∞ endpoint estimates for certain (random) maximal functions are proven, and in Urban and Zienkiewicz [24] and Mirek [20] where endpoint estimates for (deterministic) maximal functions taken over "thin" subsets of the integers are established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“….) where I. g(n) = n ω if ω > 1 and ω / ∈ N. In fact there is a interval ω ∈ [1, a] for very small a where ([n ω ]) n≥1 is L 1 good universal [27]. II.…”
Section: Examples Of Hartmann Uniformly Distributed and Good Universamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it will cause no confusion if we use the same letter M h f in the definitions (1.2) and (1.8). The proof of Theorem 1.7 (see Section 6) will be based on the concepts of [20]. In [20] the authors used a subtle version of Calderón-Zygmund decomposition, which was pioneered by Fefferman [9] and later on developed by Christ [8], to study maximal functions.…”
Section: Mmirekmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of Theorem 1.7 (see Section 6) will be based on the concepts of [20]. In [20] the authors used a subtle version of Calderón-Zygmund decomposition, which was pioneered by Fefferman [9] and later on developed by Christ [8], to study maximal functions. Fefferman's ideas turned out to be applicable to the discrete settings as it was shown in [20], and recently also in [12] and [7].…”
Section: Mmirekmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation