2018
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2017.2731817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weakly Coupled Dynamic Program: Information and Lagrangian Relaxations

Abstract: Weakly coupled dynamic program" describes a broad class of stochastic optimization problems in which multiple controlled stochastic processes evolve independently but subject to a set of linking constraints imposed on the controls. One feature of the weakly coupled dynamic program is that it decouples into lower-dimensional dynamic programs by dualizing the linking constraint via the Lagrangian relaxation, which also yields a bound on the optimal value of the original dynamic program. Together with the Lagrang… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Independently, Ye et al (2014) show a similar decoupling for weakly coupled DPs and Lagrangian relaxations; like Hawkins (2003) and Adelman and Mersereau (2008), they assume a product form for state transition probabilities that does not hold in the multiclass queueing application we study in Section 5. Ye et al (2014) study the use of subgradient methods to solve their decoupled inner problems and provide a "gap analysis" that describes a limit on how much slack can be introduced by using Lagrangian relaxations of the inner problems. In our multiclass queueing example with grouped Lagrangian relaxations, using a subgradient method with groups of size 4 would still require solving DPs with 10,000τ states, and the runtimes could still be substantial, particuarly given that subgradient methods can be slow to converge.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Independently, Ye et al (2014) show a similar decoupling for weakly coupled DPs and Lagrangian relaxations; like Hawkins (2003) and Adelman and Mersereau (2008), they assume a product form for state transition probabilities that does not hold in the multiclass queueing application we study in Section 5. Ye et al (2014) study the use of subgradient methods to solve their decoupled inner problems and provide a "gap analysis" that describes a limit on how much slack can be introduced by using Lagrangian relaxations of the inner problems. In our multiclass queueing example with grouped Lagrangian relaxations, using a subgradient method with groups of size 4 would still require solving DPs with 10,000τ states, and the runtimes could still be substantial, particuarly given that subgradient methods can be slow to converge.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Desai et al (2011) show how to improve on bounds from approximate linear programming with perfect information relaxations, and Smith (2011, 2014) show that using information relaxations with "gradient penalties" improves bounds from relaxed DP models when the DP has a convex structure. In independent work, Ye et al (2014) study weakly coupled DPs and show that improved bounds can be obtained by combining perfect information relaxations with Lagrangian relaxations; they do not consider reformulations. We also use Lagrangian relaxations in our multiclass queueing examples and find the reformulations to be quite useful in that application.…”
Section: Literature Review and Outlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relevant literature review is given by Chand et al (2002), and an early theoretical treatment is offered by Sethi and Sorger (1991). Finally, our overall approach can also be used in other applications that involve decision making over an infinite horizon, such as the multiclass queueing and inventory control problems discussed in Brown and Haugh (2017) or dynamic product promotion (Ye et al, 2018).…”
Section: Production and Operations Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geoffrion's theorem [26] ensures that we can compute z LR by solving the Dantzig-Wolfe reformulation of MILP (21) within a column generation approach. The proof of Proposition 8 and the full details of the column generation algorithm are available in Appendix E. Note that Lagrangian relaxation has already been used in the literature on weakly coupled stochastic dynamic programs to compute upper bounds [2,30,61].…”
Section: A Tractable Upper Bound Through Lagrangian Relaxationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such models have been applied to stochastic inventory routing with limited vehicle capacity [32], stochastic multi-product dispatch problems [46], scheduling problems [60], resources allocation [27], revenue management [56] among others [30]. The specific structure of these problems can then be leveraged in mathematical programming formulations that use approximate value functions [17] or approximate moments [9] as variables, notably using the Lagrangian relaxation of non-anticipativity constraints [11] or of the linking constraints [61]. All the mathematical programs in this paper can be formulated either using moments variables (or marginal probabilities) or value function variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%