2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.spa.2007.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weakly dependent chains with infinite memory

Abstract: We prove the existence of a weakly dependent strictly stationary solution of the equation Xt = F (Xt−1, Xt−2, Xt−3, . . . ; ξt) called chain with infinite memory. Here the innovations ξt constitute an independent and identically distributed sequence of random variables. The function F takes values in some Banach space and satisfies a Lipschitz-type condition. We also study the interplay between the existence of moments and the rate of decay of the Lipschitz coefficients of the function F . With the help of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
131
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
131
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar conditions are given in Götze and Hipp (1994). Doukhan and Wintenberger (2008) considered the AR(∞) or chain with infinite memory model…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar conditions are given in Götze and Hipp (1994). Doukhan and Wintenberger (2008) considered the AR(∞) or chain with infinite memory model…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Note that in our setting W (1) = ∞ j=1 w j = 1, while W (1) < 1 is required in Doukhan and Wintenberger (2008). Hence we can allow stronger dependence.…”
Section: ] (23) Admits a Stationary Solution Of The Form (1) And [Ii]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The above result has been derived by using the general theory of Doukhan and Wintenberger (2008) where the authors consider an infinite memory chain {X t , t ∈ Z} which satisfies the recurrence equation…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To apply the theory of Doukhan and Wintenberger (2008) to the case of model (1), we introduced in the proof of Theorem 2.1 the vector process X t = (Y t , λ t ) and the function F (·) by means of (Y t , λ t ) = (N t (f (X t−1 , . .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%