1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00187282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weakly nonlinear stability analyses of one-dimensional Turing pattern formation in activator-inhibitor/immobilizer model systems

Abstract: The development of one-dimensional Turing patterns characteristic of the chlorite-iodide-malonic acid/starch reaction as well as analogous Brussellator/immobilizer and Schnackenberg/immobilizer model systems is investigated by means of a weakly nonlinear stability analysis applied to the appropriately scaled governing equations. Then the theoretical predictions deduced from these pattern formation studies are compared with experimental evidence relevant to the Turing diffusive instabilities under examination i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Stephenson and Wollkind [7], (I) and (II) represent the homogeneous and striped states, respectively, while (III) can be identified with a rhombic pattern possessing a characteristic angle φ. Here, a 1 = 0.1, a 2 = 0.1, a 3 = 0.5, a 4 = 0.1, a 5 = 0.1, a 6 = 0.1, b 1 = 0.1, b 2 = 0.1, µ 1 = 0.9 and q 2 c = 1.…”
Section: Model Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Stephenson and Wollkind [7], (I) and (II) represent the homogeneous and striped states, respectively, while (III) can be identified with a rhombic pattern possessing a characteristic angle φ. Here, a 1 = 0.1, a 2 = 0.1, a 3 = 0.5, a 4 = 0.1, a 5 = 0.1, a 6 = 0.1, b 1 = 0.1, b 2 = 0.1, µ 1 = 0.9 and q 2 c = 1.…”
Section: Model Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2.9) of the form used by Stephenson and Wollkind in[7],ṽ (x, y, t) ∼ A(t) cos(q c x)ṽ 1010 + B(t) cos(q c z)ṽ 0101 + A 2 (t)[ṽ 2000 + ṽ 2020 cos(2q c x)] + A(t)B(t)[ṽ 1111 cos(q c (x + z)) + ṽ 111(−1) cos(q c (x − z))] + B 2 (t)[ṽ 0200 + ṽ 0202 cos(2q c z)] + A 3 (t)[ṽ 3010 cos(q c x) + ṽ 3030 cos(3q c x)] + A 2 (t)B(t)[ṽ 2101 cos(q c z) + ṽ 2121 cos(q c (2x + z)) + ṽ 212(−1) cos(q c (2x − z))] + A(t)B 2 (t)[ṽ 1210 cos(q c x) + ṽ 1212 cos(q c (x + 2z)) + ṽ 121(−2) cos(q c (x − 2z))] + B 3 (t)[ṽ 0301 cos(q c z) + ṽ 0303 cos(3q c z)] (3.1) where ṽ (x, y, t) ≡ i(x, y, t)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, we will consider amplitude equations that have been discussed frequently in the context of pattern formation. The amplitude equations that will be presented below describe pattern formation in fluid layers under Benard instability [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30], pattern formation in chemical reaction-diffusion systems [31], pattern formation in metal solidification processes [32] and the emergence of patterns in diffusive signaling processes in cells [33,34]. Moreover, the amplitude equations can be transformed into the form of Lotka-Volterra equations [35].…”
Section: Walking and Running Attractors: Definition Via Amplitude Equmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the next section, we shall carry out a weakly non-linear stability analysis on (2.14)–(2.15) in order to show the existence of rhombic and hexagonal planform solutions to our model following the technique discussed by Wollkind et al(1994) and reviewed by Stephenson and Wollkind (1995).…”
Section: G Protein-coupled Signal Transductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Please see the work of Stephenson and Wollkind, (1995) for more detail of the technique. On substituting this solution (3.7) into (3.5), we obtain a sequence of vector systems, each of which corresponds to one of these terms.…”
Section: A Rhombic Planform Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%