2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-24801-6_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weakly Supervised Transfer Learning for Multi-label Appliance Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differently, in [7], the authors adopt a weakly supervised multilabel approach to reduce the labeling effort to train a CRNN, using both weakly labeled data (labels provided for a group of consecutive samples, e.g., for a 4 hours period) and strongly labeled data (i.e., labeled sample-by-sample). Successively, a transfer learning approach based on weak labels has been proposed in [13].…”
Section: A Multilabel Appliance Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Differently, in [7], the authors adopt a weakly supervised multilabel approach to reduce the labeling effort to train a CRNN, using both weakly labeled data (labels provided for a group of consecutive samples, e.g., for a 4 hours period) and strongly labeled data (i.e., labeled sample-by-sample). Successively, a transfer learning approach based on weak labels has been proposed in [13].…”
Section: A Multilabel Appliance Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We investigate a real-world scenario where the network model is initially trained on a large quantity of publicly available measurements, annotated with strong and weak labels. Then, only weakly annotated data are available, labeled by end-users in a target environment, to fine-tune the network [13] and to distil the less complex model. Note that in the proposed method, end users are asked only for weak information about their appliance usage, with a significant reduction of labeling effort compared to strong labels and improved performance compared to unlabeled data.…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In terms of the aforementioned manual annotations, under this approach, users would only need to indicate whether an appliance was used or not within a certain time window. Also, for the transfer learning procedure, in [41] weak supervision was demonstrated to be effective compared to a supervised strategy, especially in the practical scenario of acquiring labels from the user feedback. Considering the multi-label appliance classification task, a weak label is provided for an entire temporal segment of the aggregate signal indicating whether an appliance is ON or OFF within that segment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%