IT Enabled Services 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-1425-4_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weaknesses of the E-Government Development Index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to future work our study could be extended to include new Eurostat (2016-2020) and UN (2018-2020) data and involve other e-Government indicators suggested by various authors [33][34][35]. On the other hand, a new analysis could be carried out excluding the countries with no Eurostat data for any of the years, e.g.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to future work our study could be extended to include new Eurostat (2016-2020) and UN (2018-2020) data and involve other e-Government indicators suggested by various authors [33][34][35]. On the other hand, a new analysis could be carried out excluding the countries with no Eurostat data for any of the years, e.g.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factors shown in table 2 indicate a high level of threats and shortcomings in the process of the public administration system modern transformation in the Russian Federation. This is largely reflected in the digitalization of management relationships and the strengthening of horizontal partnerships between the state and municipal authorities, the people and private businesses [5]. At the same time, a number of opportunities and advantages are seen in the development and use of digital elements for the provision of private and public economic services, while removing unnecessary organizational and management barriers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hala ere, badira indize honi ahulguneak topatu dizkioten ikertzaileak. Kabbar eta Dell (2013) autoreek adierazten dute indizearen azterketa kritiko gutxi egin dela eta, Nazio Batuen Erakundeak (NBE) eGobernuaren garapena adierazteko emandako balio absolutu batek, ez duela zertan lagungarri izan herrialde bat dituen gaitasunen arabera zer moduz ari den ondorioztatzeko. EGDI gaur egungo ordenazio teknika estandar gisa eta influentzia handiko balio gisa errekonozitzen duten arren, argi dute EGDIk ez duela ematen Barne Produktu Gordina (BPG) desberdina duten herrialdeen arteko konparaketa egiteko aukerarik.…”
Section: Arloko Egoera Eta Helburuakunclassified