1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf01371940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wealth and the demand for money: Empirical evidence for the Netherlands and Belgium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples are the Bundesbank (1995) and Gerdesmeier (1996) for Germany, Hall et al (1989) for the United Kingdom, and Fase and Winder (1996) for Belgium and the Netherlands (see also Sterken, 1992). Fase and Winder (1996) found for both Belgium and the Netherlands that the wealth elasticity of the demand for M2 was sligthly higher than for M3. The results in table 1 show that for the European Union as a whole the wealth elasticity of M3 is somewhat higher.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples are the Bundesbank (1995) and Gerdesmeier (1996) for Germany, Hall et al (1989) for the United Kingdom, and Fase and Winder (1996) for Belgium and the Netherlands (see also Sterken, 1992). Fase and Winder (1996) found for both Belgium and the Netherlands that the wealth elasticity of the demand for M2 was sligthly higher than for M3. The results in table 1 show that for the European Union as a whole the wealth elasticity of M3 is somewhat higher.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%