Introduction and BackgroundGiddens' 1 structuration theory has long been a popular theoretical lens for management accounting researchers, especially in the area of management accounting change. 2 Since the publication of Robert and Scapens 3 and Macintosh and Scapens, 4 which introduced structuration theory to accounting researchers, many structuration-inspired articles have been published in accounting journals. Recently, there has been a renewed interest in evaluating the achievements and potentials of the theory in extant accounting research. 5 However, we feel that these evaluations in accounting research do not seem to fully engage with the fundamentals of structuration theory. 6 The aim of this paper is to fill this gap. First, the structuration theory has made a significant contribution to 'alternative' accounting research which offers challenges to a rational/positivist view of accounting. Second, it also offers an alternative to the more structure or agency centric accounting research and provides us with richer explanations of accounting change especially management accounting change.
Recent works by Englund and Gerdin