2001
DOI: 10.1179/jfa.2001.28.3-4.253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wear Analysis on Early Mesolithic Microliths from the Verrebroek Site, East Flanders, Belgium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Microliths, as components of barbed projectiles, may have been economically advantageous in that associated weaponry could have increased success in capturing mobile prey through improved hunting technologies. Microlithic tools served a number of functions (31), but it is often argued that they were components of serial armatures which increased the maintainability and reliability of tools during time-stressed hunting trips (29) and increased penetration and blood loss through multiple cutting edges and internal fragmentation of the adhering barbs (32)(33)(34). It seems likely that the use of microliths in South Asia is associated with changes in subsistence practices, and the various archaeological, genetic, and paleoenvironmental findings presented here, although not conclusive, suggest that this use may have been necessitated in this region by a combination of landscape fragmentation, overall environmental deterioration, and increased population packing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microliths, as components of barbed projectiles, may have been economically advantageous in that associated weaponry could have increased success in capturing mobile prey through improved hunting technologies. Microlithic tools served a number of functions (31), but it is often argued that they were components of serial armatures which increased the maintainability and reliability of tools during time-stressed hunting trips (29) and increased penetration and blood loss through multiple cutting edges and internal fragmentation of the adhering barbs (32)(33)(34). It seems likely that the use of microliths in South Asia is associated with changes in subsistence practices, and the various archaeological, genetic, and paleoenvironmental findings presented here, although not conclusive, suggest that this use may have been necessitated in this region by a combination of landscape fragmentation, overall environmental deterioration, and increased population packing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, reconstructing their design constitutes a necessary stage in studies intended to investigate the performance of these tools. Such reconstructions have been attempted in a few studies based on archery experiments involving microliths hafted as projectile inserts in different modes and investigation of projectile damage patterns on experimental and archaeological microliths (Nuzhnyy, 1990(Nuzhnyy, , 1999Crombe at al., 2001). These studies indicated a connection between temporal change in microlithic variability and transformations in the design of projectile weapons during the Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic in Europe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental studies with different flint projectile elements have provided descriptions of a variety of fracture types resulting from projectile impact (Fischer et al, 1984, Barton andBergman, 1982;Bergman and Newcomer, 1983;Moss and Newcomer, 1982;Odell and Cowan, 1986;Nuzhnyy, , 1990Nuzhnyy, , 1999Cattelain and Perpère, 1994;Caspar and De Bie, 1996;Crombe at al., 2001;Shea, 1988;Lombard and Pargetter, 2008). The terminology of damage most commonly used in describing fractures resulting from projectile impact was developed through the experimental study of Fisher et al, (1984) based on the morphology of fracture initiation and termination as seen in profile (Ho-Ho classification, Hayden, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are some differences in the intensity of retouch, as measured by Kuhn's (1990) Shea 1988Shea , 1997 were found on 4.1% of the blades, 5.0% of the elongated Levallois points, and 12.5% of the Levallois points; all are present on the distal end. These are usually of the 'burinlike'/'burination' or 'flute' type (e.g., Bergman and Newcomer 1983;Crombé et al 2001;Odell and Cowan 1986: 204). The difference between Levallois points and blades is statistically significant (χ²=6.31, df=1, p=0.012).…”
Section: Tabun Cavementioning
confidence: 99%