1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf02648274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wear and erosion behavior of plasma-sprayed WC-Co coatings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The applied load was fixed at 10 N and the sliding distance at 2500 m. Both experimental and predicted results are in well agreement in the case of lower sliding velocities (less than 0.8 m s À 1 ) showing no significant influence on the friction coefficient. This behaviour is observed in various studies [26,27]. However, in the case of the predicted results, a relative increase of the friction coefficient is recorded for high-sliding velocities.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 37%
“…The applied load was fixed at 10 N and the sliding distance at 2500 m. Both experimental and predicted results are in well agreement in the case of lower sliding velocities (less than 0.8 m s À 1 ) showing no significant influence on the friction coefficient. This behaviour is observed in various studies [26,27]. However, in the case of the predicted results, a relative increase of the friction coefficient is recorded for high-sliding velocities.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 37%
“…This debris, with grain sizes ranging from about 200 nm to 15 lm, stems from ball wear and WC grain pull-out and fragmentation. This mode of abrasive wear is different from the one observed in conventional abrasion tests ( Ref 7,21,23,24) where larger abrasive particles produce more severe wear (higher wear rates and different wear tracks). Qiao et al found that abrasive wear is about 50,000 times higher than sliding wear (Ref 21).…”
Section: Wear and Tribological Behaviormentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The amount of boron fell to 1.6 wt.% from 5.9 wt.% (Table 3) as a result of the spraying. This loss can be explained by a similar phenomenon such as decarburization, during spraying [15,16]. The coating structure consists more: or less of bulk materials and contains fewer pores.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Feedstock Powdersmentioning
confidence: 95%