1993
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(93)90071-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wear and scratch hardness of 304 stainless steel investigated with a single scratch test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, comparison between the results obtained from the scratch and indentation hardness methods indicates that the ratio of scratch hardness to indentation hardness is around 1.4 in all specimens. Similar ratios have also been reported in some other studies 48, 49. Existence of this ratio is because of some involving terms in the scratching process that are absent in the indentation experiments.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, comparison between the results obtained from the scratch and indentation hardness methods indicates that the ratio of scratch hardness to indentation hardness is around 1.4 in all specimens. Similar ratios have also been reported in some other studies 48, 49. Existence of this ratio is because of some involving terms in the scratching process that are absent in the indentation experiments.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…At higher loads, wear was found to be the dominating deformation mode where material was worn out as clear from the optical micrographs ( Figure 3) of residual tracks. Same behavior has been observed by Adler and Walters where SS 304 was tested under single scratch with three different normal loads [17]. In our case, load is increasing linearly from 1 N to 15 N during a single scratch.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, the conventional scratch tests are mostly done on the initial surface [20][21][22][23][24], which can be very different to those that form during the abrasion process, e.g. irregularity, continuous development of subsurface deformation and work hardening etc., and hence do not automatically reflect the material abrasion resistant response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%