2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-1922-2_33
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wear Debris Classification and Quantity and Size Calculation Using Convolutional Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sengupta et al [15] and Goilkar et al [16] demonstrated that a protective layer on a mild steel component will lessen corrosion, avoid material wear, and keep outside particles from getting into the lubricant. UstbNet is a better lightweight convolutional neural network that Wang et al [17] suggested for the classification of wear debris images.…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sengupta et al [15] and Goilkar et al [16] demonstrated that a protective layer on a mild steel component will lessen corrosion, avoid material wear, and keep outside particles from getting into the lubricant. UstbNet is a better lightweight convolutional neural network that Wang et al [17] suggested for the classification of wear debris images.…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers combined various techniques with magnetic sensors to detect the quality of the abrasive grains. These included optical sensors [ 16 , 17 ], resistive magnetic plug sensors [ 18 ], capacitive magnetic plug sensors [ 19 ], and inductive magnetic plug sensors [ 20 ]. There are two main optical detection methods: the light blockage method [ 16 ] and the imaging method [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These included optical sensors [ 16 , 17 ], resistive magnetic plug sensors [ 18 ], capacitive magnetic plug sensors [ 19 ], and inductive magnetic plug sensors [ 20 ]. There are two main optical detection methods: the light blockage method [ 16 ] and the imaging method [ 17 ]. Nonetheless, these techniques necessitate the implementation of intricate algorithms and high-performance hardware infrastructure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study used CNN to detect the wear condition present in a mechanical setup without classifying the wear debris, with an accuracy of 90% ( Wang et al, 2020 ). However, for the detailed quantitative analysis of wear debris, the average classification accuracies for different types of wear debris ranges from 77% to 83% across multiple studies ( Wang H et al, 2019 ; Wang et al, 2020 ; Wang S et al, 2019 ). CNN-based identification and classification of wear debris in joint arthroplasty have been shown to have very high accuracies in multi-class morphological classifications as shown in ( Hu et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%