2018
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wear properties of poly‐ether‐ether‐ketone bearing combinations under zero and cross shear kinematics in total knee arthroplasty

Abstract: Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK), having shown favorable biocompatibility in spinal applications is being considered as an alternative biomaterial in orthopaedics, either as part of an all-polymer bearing couple, or a replacement for the metallic component in hard-on-soft bearings. Throughout the literature ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene exhibits a range of wear behavior dependent upon the amount of cross shear (CS) present in the bearing motion; in comparison, the behavior of PEEK bearing combinations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in multi-directional motion with cross-shear ratio of 0.254, the wear factor increased to (1.27 ± 0.09) × 10 −5 mm 3 /N•m, which was about nine-fold larger than that of CFR-PEEK under the same conditions. The research results were similar to those in [25]. However, the values of the average wear factor of CFR-PEEK materials hardly changed under different cross-shear conditions.…”
Section: Wear Analysissupporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, in multi-directional motion with cross-shear ratio of 0.254, the wear factor increased to (1.27 ± 0.09) × 10 −5 mm 3 /N•m, which was about nine-fold larger than that of CFR-PEEK under the same conditions. The research results were similar to those in [25]. However, the values of the average wear factor of CFR-PEEK materials hardly changed under different cross-shear conditions.…”
Section: Wear Analysissupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Based on all the references compiled in Tables A.2 and A.3 in the Appendix of this article, all the parameters of interest in the design space have been classified into either input or output parameters. The tribo-mechanical properties of PEEK and PEEK composites (output parameters) cannot be altered directly, but can be affected indirectly by tailoring other parameters of interest (input parameters) such as the material's microstructure, its composition, the articulating material coupling, as well as the testing and environmental conditions under which the experiments are performed (Flöck et al, 1999;Unsworth, 2007, 2009;Evans et al, 2014;Cowie et al, 2020;Scholes and Unsworth, 2010;East et al, 2015;Brockett et al, 2017;Grupp et al, 2010;Wang et al, 1998b;Brockett et al, 2012;Polineni et al, 1998;Kandemir et al, 2019;Regis et al, 2018;Wang et al, 1999;Chamberlain et al, 2019;Brockett et al, 2016). The definitions are as follows: input parameters (also known as control parameters) are the ones which can be controlled directly during experiments while the output parameters can be indirectly influenced by adjusting the input parameters but there exists no way to alter them through a direct route.…”
Section: Tribological Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PEEK is lightweight and easy to manufacture, and its ability to withstand chemical and radiation damage, as well as its reduced distortion on three-dimensional imaging, has led to numerous studies exploring its potential as a substrate for orthopedic load-bearing implants [14]. While it has shown promise in studies focusing on its use in fracture fixation plates in orthopedic trauma [15][16][17], reports of PEEK's failure as an articulating component against metallic counter face are gradually emerging [18,19]. PEEK's reduced structural stiffness may lead to reduced interface stresses, eventually resulting in deformation and instability of knee arthroplasty prostheses, as described by Abdullah et al for PEEK femoral components [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%