Wearable sensor systems measure differences in knee laxity between healthy and affected knees during dynamic exercise activities: A systematic review

Abstract

PurposeKnee laxity can be experienced as knee instability which may lead to a limitation in the activity of patients. Current methods to determine knee instability are performed in a static setting, which does not always correlate with dynamic knee laxity during activities. Wearables might be able to measure knee laxity in a dynamic setting and could be of added value in the diagnosis and treatment of excessive knee laxity. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the wearables that have been developed and their ability to measure knee laxity during dynamic activities.MethodsThe PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews were followed. A literature search was conducted in EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane databases. Included studies assessed patients with knee instability using a non‐invasive wearable sensor system during dynamic activity, with comparison to a reference system or healthy knees. Data extraction was performed by two authors via a predefined format. The risk of bias was assessed by The Dutch checklist for diagnostic tests.ResultsA total of 4734 articles were identified. Thirteen studies were included in the review. The studies showed a great variety of patients, sensor systems, reference tests, outcome measures and performed activities. Nine of the included studies were able to measure differences in patients with knee instability, all including a tri‐axial accelerometer. Differences were not measurable in all parameters and activities in these studies.ConclusionsWearables, including at least a tri‐axial accelerometer, seem promising for measuring dynamic knee laxity in the anterior‐posterior and mediolateral direction. At this stage, it remains unclear if the measured outcomes completely reflect the knee instability that patients experience in daily life.Level of EvidenceLevel III.