2019
DOI: 10.1504/ijtmkt.2019.104586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wearable XR-technology: literature review, conceptual framework and future research directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, concerns regarding unauthorized access to one's health data and photos generated using the cameras integrated into the devices lower the likelihood of consenting to treatments with MR headsets [14]. This skepticism confirms studies from the consumer sector [15], for instance, by revealing that privacy concerns significantly reduce MR acceptance [24].…”
Section: Figure 1 Ppe Using Vsi Pe [7]mentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, concerns regarding unauthorized access to one's health data and photos generated using the cameras integrated into the devices lower the likelihood of consenting to treatments with MR headsets [14]. This skepticism confirms studies from the consumer sector [15], for instance, by revealing that privacy concerns significantly reduce MR acceptance [24].…”
Section: Figure 1 Ppe Using Vsi Pe [7]mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Moreover, a crossover trial with elderly patients by Rohrbach et al [11] revealed that 30% of the control group tended to be reluctant toward wearing MR glasses due to their novelty and the lack of wearing comfort. In line with these observations, Chuah [15] recently called for illuminating user resistance to MR technologies by employing configurational approaches to provide researchers and practitioners with insights into the factors that explain the lack of acceptance of MR glasses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, IoT can be used to discrimination against certain individuals when prioritizing people for health-care treatment by pinpointing good and bad citizens based on behavioral data collected by IoT (Wright et al , 2014). These adverse consequences might hinder the wider acceptance of IR 4.0 technologies (Chuah, 2019).…”
Section: Health Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the vast growth of XR, consumer acceptance is still limited and academic research on such technology and their applications are extremely restricted (Bonetti et al , 2018). For instance, companies and researchers who are studying the use of wearable devices in tourism (Chuah, 2019), demonstrated that little attention has been paid to using predictive models for XR wearable technology acceptance which is a new technology (Herz and Rauschnabel, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another issue is that previous studies on predictive models have not focussed on dark side of technology accpetance and less is known about why users resist to technology which is a major reason for the failures of new IS implementation (Chuah, 2019). For instance, Suh and Prophet (2018), have highlighted the negative parts of technology acceptance models such as motion sickness, physical discomfort, cognitive overload and distracted attrition, which could increase user stress levels.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%