2023
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4482179
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weather-Aware Object Detection Method for Maritime Surveillance Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the YOLOv7 algorithm, the mAP 0.5:0.95 , mAP 0.5 , and AP S of the YOLO-BEV algorithm increases by 2.4%, 2.9%, and 13.4%, respectively, and the FPS rate increases by 30%. Three methods, namely YOLOv5, Fast R-CNN, and DETR, were used in reference [24]. Compared with method 3 in reference [24], all evaluation indexes were improved, among which AP S was increased by 12.7%.…”
Section: Ablation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to the YOLOv7 algorithm, the mAP 0.5:0.95 , mAP 0.5 , and AP S of the YOLO-BEV algorithm increases by 2.4%, 2.9%, and 13.4%, respectively, and the FPS rate increases by 30%. Three methods, namely YOLOv5, Fast R-CNN, and DETR, were used in reference [24]. Compared with method 3 in reference [24], all evaluation indexes were improved, among which AP S was increased by 12.7%.…”
Section: Ablation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three methods, namely YOLOv5, Fast R-CNN, and DETR, were used in reference [24]. Compared with method 3 in reference [24], all evaluation indexes were improved, among which AP S was increased by 12.7%. Although the method in reference [26] achieves 40 FPS in real-time, the average detection accuracy for small objects is only 0.350.…”
Section: Ablation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation