2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weather-wise: A weather-aware planning tool for improving construction productivity and dealing with claims

Abstract: THANKS FOR DOWNLOADING THIS PAPER.This is a post-refereeing version of a manuscript published by Elsevier.Please, in order to cite this paper properly: The authors recommend going to the publisher's website in order to access the full paper. BallesterosIf this paper helped you somehow in your research, feel free to cite it. Weather

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is considered sufficiently representative for the UK which is where the proposed method will be applied later. Similar combinations of weather variables have also been considered recently by other authors (Ballesteros-P erez et al 2017a(Ballesteros-P erez et al , 2017b for both Spain and the UK.…”
Section: Combinations Of Weather Variables Affecting Construction Actmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…However, it is considered sufficiently representative for the UK which is where the proposed method will be applied later. Similar combinations of weather variables have also been considered recently by other authors (Ballesteros-P erez et al 2017a(Ballesteros-P erez et al , 2017b for both Spain and the UK.…”
Section: Combinations Of Weather Variables Affecting Construction Actmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Going back to the causes of project delays, many factors have been identified: poor planning and controlling practices (Assaf & Al-Hejji, 2006;Assaf, Al-Khalil & Al-Hazmi, 1995), poor site management (Abdul-Rahman, Berawi, Berawi, Mohamed, Othman & Yahya, 2006;Alaghbari et al, 2007), labor shortage and lower productivity (Odeh & Battaineh, 2001;Sweis, Sweis, Abu Hammad & Shboul, 2008), problems with materials supply chain and procurement (Lo, Fung & Tung, 2006;Ballesteros-Pérez, del Campo-Hitschfeld, Mora-Melià & Domínguez-Santos, 2015), reworks of defective units or units with insufficient quality (Ballesteros-Pérez, 2017a;Forcada, Rusiñol, Macarulla & Love, 2014), contractor's and/or client's financial difficulties (Mansfield, Ugwu & Doran, 1994;Ogunlana et al, 1996), design changes (Arditi, Akan & Gurdamar, 2006;Mezher & Tawil, 1998), poor communication and co-ordination (Fimpong & Oluwoye, 2003), unexpected field interferences (Alarcón, Diethelm, Rojo & Calderon, 2005), adverse weather (Ballesteros-Pérez, del Campo-Hitschfeld, González-Naranjo & González-Cruz, 2015;Ballesteros-Pérez et al, 2017), legal disputes (Yogeswaran, Kumaraswamy & Miller, 1998), to cite just a few. It may not be a surprise then that delays in the final completion of projects are acknowledged in many sectors as one of the most common, costly, complex, and risky problems a project manager can face (Fawzy & El-adaway, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of weather conditions is a manifestation of the impact of the dynamically changing environment. Variable climatic conditions in time and space generate different deadlines (and related costs) for the implementation of various construction processes and the related risk of failure to meet the assumed deadline for implementation, budget overrun and failure to meet quality requirements [1,2]. It is necessary to emphasize the oftenencountered pressure to shorten the implementation cycle, which imposes the necessity to continue the works An example of a process exposed to a significant weather risk is concreting under conditions of cold temperature, when despite the start of the process under favorable conditions there is a danger of sudden deterioration of maturation conditions (frost attack) and damage to the concrete structure at the initial stage of curing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%