2018
DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2018.1432361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weaving Cultural Relevance and Achievement Motivation Into Inclusive Classroom Cultures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 156 publications
2
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…By shifting our focus to the instructional reasoning and decisions teachers make, we can gain a more nuanced understanding of the underlying processes that result in more effective differentiation. Future studies should focus on differentiation for all students, intentionally, expanding the literature on how instruction can be adjusted to better serve the wide range of abilities diverse students bring to the classroom (see integrative examples in Kumar, Zusho, & Bondie, 2018). Finally, by explicitly tying the research on DI to actual student learning outcomes, we could gain critical information about the overall impact of this DI on achievement and broader learning outcomes.…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By shifting our focus to the instructional reasoning and decisions teachers make, we can gain a more nuanced understanding of the underlying processes that result in more effective differentiation. Future studies should focus on differentiation for all students, intentionally, expanding the literature on how instruction can be adjusted to better serve the wide range of abilities diverse students bring to the classroom (see integrative examples in Kumar, Zusho, & Bondie, 2018). Finally, by explicitly tying the research on DI to actual student learning outcomes, we could gain critical information about the overall impact of this DI on achievement and broader learning outcomes.…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRT, defined by Gay (2002) as teachers' knowledge of and attitudes toward cultural diversity, has the following five essential components: (1) a knowledge base related to cultural diversity, (2) a culturally relevant curriculum design, (3) learning communities, (4) cross‐cultural communication; and (5) cultural congruity in classroom instruction (Gay, 2002). Culturally responsive teachers contextualise instruction within the cultural forms, behaviours and processes of student learning (Savva, 2017); additionally, such teachers acknowledge the legitimacy of students’ cultural backgrounds by incorporating culturally relevant content and instructional strategies for motivating students to learn (Gay, 2010; Kumar, Zusho, & Bondie, 2018).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We argue, then, that while the pursuit of educating students to be successful at tradition notions of vocabulary and disciplinary content acquisition may, in the short‐term, lead to greater performance on standardized tests, particularly at the elementary levels, these types of curricular designs may not fulfill the promise of designing for equity as a process that allows all students to see themselves as life‐long learners related to the STEM, nor does it embrace the idea that relevancy impacts motivation within such disciplines (Kumar, Zusho, & Bondie, ). To this end, our research provides support that students from diverse backgrounds can learn science in meaningful ways and develop more positive attitudes toward the discipline, when the content is contextualized in their local contexts.…”
Section: Implications and Principal Contribution To The Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%